• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广谱β-内酰胺单药治疗与联合氨基糖苷类药物治疗严重弥漫性腹膜炎的疗效相当:一项多中心随机对照试验。严重弥漫性腹膜炎研究组

Monotherapy with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam is as effective as its combination with an aminoglycoside in treatment of severe generalized peritonitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The Severe Generalized Peritonitis Study Group.

作者信息

Dupont H, Carbon C, Carlet J

机构信息

Department of Surgical ICU, University Hospital Bichat, Paris, France.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Aug;44(8):2028-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.8.2028-2033.2000.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.44.8.2028-2033.2000
PMID:10898671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC90009/
Abstract

In a randomized trial conducted in 35 centers, we compared the clinical efficacy and safety of piperacillin plus tazobactam (TAZ) alone (monotherapy [MT]) versus those of TAZ combined with amikacin (AMK) (combined therapy [CT]) for the treatment of severe generalized peritonitis (SGP). Primary analysis consisted of blind assessment by an independent committee of the failure rate 30 days after the end of treatment in the modified intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (mITT) population. Of the 241 patients with suspected SGP randomized into the study, 227 were eligible for ITT analysis, including 204 (99 in the MT group and 105 in the CT group) with confirmed SGP (mITT population). A total of 159 patients were eligible for per-protocol (PP) analysis. The clinical failure rates were equivalent in the mITT and PP populations (MT versus CT): 56 versus 52%, (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 90% confidence interval [CI] = 0. 6 to 1.27) for mITT and 49 versus 49% (OR = 1.03, 90% CI = 0.67 to 1. 59) for PP analysis. Mortality rates (ITT population, 19%; PP population, 21%) and overall adverse event rates (ITT population, 55%; PP population, 54%) were also similar. Six patients (three in MT group and three in the CT group) developed acute renal failure. In conclusion, the addition of AMK to TAZ does not seem to be necessary for the treatment of SGP, even after adjustment for the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) and type of SGP.

摘要

在一项由35个中心开展的随机试验中,我们比较了哌拉西林加他唑巴坦(TAZ)单药治疗(单药疗法[MT])与TAZ联合阿米卡星(AMK)(联合疗法[CT])治疗严重弥漫性腹膜炎(SGP)的临床疗效和安全性。主要分析包括由独立委员会在改良意向性治疗(ITT)分析(mITT)人群中对治疗结束后30天的失败率进行盲法评估。在随机纳入该研究的241例疑似SGP患者中,227例符合ITT分析条件,其中204例(MT组99例,CT组105例)确诊为SGP(mITT人群)。共有159例患者符合符合方案(PP)分析条件。mITT和PP人群中的临床失败率相当(MT组与CT组):mITT分析中分别为56%和52%(优势比[OR]0.87,90%置信区间[CI]=0.6至1.27),PP分析中分别为49%和49%(OR=1.03,90%CI=0.67至1.59)。死亡率(ITT人群为19%;PP人群为21%)和总体不良事件发生率(ITT人群为55%;PP人群为54%)也相似。6例患者(MT组3例,CT组3例)发生急性肾衰竭。总之,即使在对简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)和SGP类型进行校正后,TAZ联合AMK治疗SGP似乎也无必要。

相似文献

1
Monotherapy with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam is as effective as its combination with an aminoglycoside in treatment of severe generalized peritonitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The Severe Generalized Peritonitis Study Group.广谱β-内酰胺单药治疗与联合氨基糖苷类药物治疗严重弥漫性腹膜炎的疗效相当:一项多中心随机对照试验。严重弥漫性腹膜炎研究组
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Aug;44(8):2028-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.8.2028-2033.2000.
2
Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial.头孢吡肟联合阿米卡星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星用于血液科发热性中性粒细胞减少患者初始抗生素治疗:一项开放、随机、多中心试验的结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Jul;50(1):79-88. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf087.
3
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin in the treatment of infective episodes after liver transplantation.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与环丙沙星加阿莫西林治疗肝移植后感染性发作的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Dec;52(6):993-1000. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg463. Epub 2003 Oct 29.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftazidime in association with amikacin for treating nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢他啶联合阿米卡星治疗重症监护患者医院获得性肺炎的疗效和耐受性:一项前瞻性随机多中心试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Mar;27(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s001340000846.
5
Piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy versus piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin as initial empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with acute leukemia.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星作为急性白血病患儿发热性中性粒细胞减少症初始经验性治疗的比较
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 May;28(4):311-20. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2011.557144.
6
Ertapenem once daily versus piperacillin-tazobactam 4 times per day for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.厄他培南每日一次与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦每日4次用于治疗成人复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲多中心研究的结果
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jun 1;34(11):1460-8. doi: 10.1086/340348. Epub 2002 May 9.
7
Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:一项双盲、随机对照III期试验的结果
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):235-45. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048551.32606.73.
8
Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin versus ceftazidime/amikacin: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. VAP Study Group.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦/阿米卡星与头孢他啶/阿米卡星治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎的多中心随机对照试验。VAP研究组
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Feb;26(2):346-54. doi: 10.1086/516294.
9
Clinafloxacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam in treatment of patients with severe skin and soft tissue infections.克林沙星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗重症皮肤及软组织感染患者的疗效比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Feb;45(2):525-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.525-531.2001.
10
A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections.一项比较序贯静脉/口服莫西沙星单药治疗与静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦后继以口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性的随机试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Nov;66(11):2632-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr344. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Adjunctive Aminoglycoside Therapy Compared to β-Lactam Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.在革兰氏阴性血流感染的重症患者中,辅助性氨基糖苷类药物治疗与β-内酰胺类单药治疗的疗效比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 May 13;14(5):497. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14050497.
2
Korean Guidelines for Use of Antibiotics for Intra-abdominal Infections in Adults.《韩国成人腹腔内感染抗生素使用指南》
Infect Chemother. 2022 Dec;54(4):812-853. doi: 10.3947/ic.2022.0156.
3
Epidemiology, clinical relevance and prognosis of staphylococci in hospital-acquired postoperative intra-abdominal infections: an observational study in intensive care unit.医院获得性术后腹腔内感染中葡萄球菌的流行病学、临床相关性和预后:重症监护病房的观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 15;11(1):5884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85443-8.
4
Outcome of community- versus hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infections in intensive care unit: a retrospective study.社区获得性与医院获得性腹腔内感染的重症监护病房结局:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01209-1.
5
Antibiotic sensitivity in correlation to the origin of secondary peritonitis: a single center analysis.抗生素敏感性与继发性腹膜炎的来源相关性:单中心分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 29;10(1):18588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73356-x.
6
Antimicrobials: a global alliance for optimizing their rational use in intra-abdominal infections (AGORA).抗菌药物:优化其在腹腔内感染中合理使用的全球联盟(AGORA)
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 15;11:33. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0089-y. eCollection 2016.
7
Compliance with an empirical antimicrobial protocol improves the outcome of complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective observational study.遵循经验性抗菌方案可改善复杂性腹腔内感染的预后:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):66-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew117.
8
Aminoglycoside use in a pediatric hospital: there is room for improvement-a before/after study.
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 May;175(5):659-65. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2691-0. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.随机试验中意向性分析的偏离与治疗效果估计:Meta流行病学研究
BMJ. 2015 May 27;350:h2445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2445.
10
Antibiotic stewardship in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的抗生素管理
Crit Care. 2014 Aug 13;18(5):480. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0480-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Early bacterial and inflammatory responses to antibiotic therapy in a model of polymicrobial peritonitis in rats.大鼠多微生物性腹膜炎模型中对抗生素治疗的早期细菌及炎症反应
Clin Microbiol Infect. 1998 Feb;4(12):701-709. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1998.tb00655.x.
2
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cefepime Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.一项比较头孢吡肟加甲硝唑与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的随机双盲临床试验。头孢吡肟腹腔内感染研究组。
Arch Surg. 1997 Dec;132(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430360040008.
3
Sepsis: a new hypothesis for pathogenesis of the disease process.脓毒症:疾病进程发病机制的新假说。
Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):235-43. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.235.
4
Peritonitis: update on pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management.腹膜炎:病理生理学、临床表现及管理的最新进展
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Jun;24(6):1035-45; quiz 1046-7. doi: 10.1086/513658.
5
Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections.导致腹腔内或皮肤/软组织感染治疗临床失败的危险因素。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;15(12):913-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01690508.
6
Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Meropenem Serious Infection Study Group.静脉注射美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗住院患者严重细菌感染的比较。美罗培南严重感染研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Sep;38(3):523-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.3.523.
7
Emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in cases of peritonitis after intraabdominal surgery affects the efficacy of empirical antimicrobial therapy.腹部手术后腹膜炎病例中出现的抗生素耐药菌会影响经验性抗菌治疗的疗效。
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Sep;23(3):486-94. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.3.486.
8
Combination antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections. Guidelines for the clinician.用于细菌感染的联合抗菌治疗。临床医生指南。
Drugs. 1996 Sep;52(3):390-405. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199652030-00005.
9
[Treatment of severe infections: should one always administer an aminoglycoside?].[严重感染的治疗:是否总是应该使用氨基糖苷类药物?]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl. 1996;76:28S-33S.
10
Prognosis in intra-abdominal infections. Multivariate analysis on 604 patients.腹腔内感染的预后。对604例患者的多因素分析。
Arch Surg. 1996 Jun;131(6):641-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180067014.