Park S, Saso Y, Ito O, Tokioka K, Kato K, Nitta N, Kitano I
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kagawa Medical University, Japan.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000 Jun;34(2):131-6. doi: 10.1080/02844310050159981.
Fifty patients with submucous cleft palate (SMCP) who had had four different operations were reviewed. The operations were pushback palatoplasty (n = 18), pharyngeal flap (n = 21), pushback palatoplasty combined with a pharyngeal flap (n = 8), and Furlow palatoplasty (n = 3). Postoperatively the speech of 8, 19, 7, and 2 patients, respectively, improved so that it was within normal limits. A secondary pharyngeal flap was done for six patients, each of whom had previously had a pushback palatoplasty. They all improved, five achieving relatively normal speech, and one good speech. No patient developed hyponasality or airway compromise associated with the pharyngeal flap. The results show that pharyngeal flap and pushback palatoplasty combined with a pharyngeal flap seem to be more reliable procedures than pushback palatoplasty for patients with SMCP.
对50例接受过四种不同手术的黏膜下腭裂(SMCP)患者进行了回顾性研究。手术方式分别为后推腭裂修复术(n = 18)、咽瓣手术(n = 21)、后推腭裂修复术联合咽瓣手术(n = 8)以及Furlow腭裂修复术(n = 3)。术后,分别有8例、19例、7例和2例患者的语音改善至正常范围。6例患者接受了二期咽瓣手术,他们之前均接受过后推腭裂修复术。所有患者均有改善,5例实现了相对正常的语音,1例语音良好。没有患者出现与咽瓣相关的鼻音减退或气道受损情况。结果表明,对于黏膜下腭裂患者,咽瓣手术以及后推腭裂修复术联合咽瓣手术似乎比后推腭裂修复术更可靠。