Lamb D, Atkinson C, Joseph D, O'Brien P, Ackland S, Bonaventura A, Dady P, Hamilton C, Spry N, Stewart J, Denham J
Wellington Hospital, New Zealand.
Australas Radiol. 1999 May;43(2):220-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.00638.x.
The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate treatment outcome after conservative breast surgery or mastectomy followed by simultaneous adjuvant radiotherapy and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) therapy. Two hundred and sixty eight (268) patients were treated at two Australian and two New Zealand centres between 1981 and July 1995. One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent conservation surgery and 99 had mastectomies. Median follow-up was 53 months. Conventionally fractionated radiation was delivered simultaneously during the first two cycles of CMF, avoiding radiation on the Fridays that the intravenous components of CMF were delivered. In conservatively treated patients, 5-year actuarial rates of any recurrence, distant recurrence and overall survival were 34.5 +/- 5.2%, 25.4 +/- 4.5% and 75.5 +/- 4.8%, respectively. Crude incidence of local relapse at 4 years was 6.3% and at regional/distant sites was 26.3%. Highest grades of granulocyte toxicity (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L), moist desquamation, radiation pneumonitis and persistent breast oedema were recorded in 10.7, 8.5, 8.9 and 17.2%, respectively. In patients treated by mastectomy, 5-year actuarial rates of any recurrence, distant recurrence and overall survival were 59.7 +/- 7.3%, 56.7 +/- 7.4% and 50.1 +/- 7%. The crude incidence of local relapse at 4 years was 5.6% and at regional/distant sites it was 45.7%. The issue of appropriate timing of adjuvant therapies has become particularly important with the increasing acknowledgement of the value of anthracycline-based regimens. For women in lower risk categories (e.g. 1-3 nodes positive or node negative), CMF may offer a potentially better therapy, particularly where breast-conserving surgical techniques have been used. In such cases CMF allows the simultaneous delivery of radiotherapy with the result of optimum local control, without compromise or regional or systemic relapse rates. Further randomized trials that directly address the optimal integration of the two modalities, such as the one carried out in Boston, are clearly necessary.
本文旨在评估保乳手术或乳房切除术联合辅助放疗及环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶(CMF)同步治疗后的治疗效果。1981年至1995年7月期间,澳大利亚和新西兰的四个中心共治疗了268例患者。其中169例行保乳手术,99例行乳房切除术。中位随访时间为53个月。在CMF的前两个周期同时进行常规分割放疗,避免在输注CMF静脉成分的周五进行放疗。在接受保乳治疗的患者中,5年任何复发、远处复发和总生存率的精算率分别为34.5±5.2%、25.4±4.5%和75.5±4.8%。4年局部复发的粗发病率为6.3%,区域/远处部位为26.3%。粒细胞毒性最高等级(<0.5×10⁹/L)、湿性脱皮、放射性肺炎和持续性乳腺水肿的发生率分别为10.7%、8.5%、8.9%和17.2%。在接受乳房切除术的患者中,5年任何复发、远处复发和总生存率的精算率分别为59.7±7.3%、56.7±7.4%和50.1±7%。4年局部复发的粗发病率为5.6%,区域/远处部位为45.7%。随着对蒽环类方案价值的认识不断提高,辅助治疗的合适时机问题变得尤为重要。对于低风险类别(如1 - 3个淋巴结阳性或淋巴结阴性)的女性,CMF可能提供一种潜在更好的治疗方法,特别是在采用保乳手术技术的情况下。在这种情况下,CMF允许同时进行放疗,从而实现最佳的局部控制,而不影响区域或全身复发率。显然有必要进行进一步的随机试验,直接探讨这两种治疗方式的最佳整合,比如波士顿进行的那项试验。