Griem K L, Henderson I C, Gelman R, Ascoli D, Silver B, Recht A, Goodman R L, Hellman S, Harris J R
Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Boston, MA 02115.
J Clin Oncol. 1987 Oct;5(10):1546-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.10.1546.
The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy has been controversial. In order to assess the necessity and effectiveness of adjuvant radiation therapy in this setting, we reviewed the results in 510 patients with T1-T3 tumors and pathologically positive nodes or tumors larger than 5 cm and negative nodes who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with four or more positive nodes or at least one positive apical node were randomized to receive either five or ten cycles of cyclophosphamide/Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) (CA) and patients with one to three positive nodes or operable tumors larger than 5 cm and pathologically negative nodes were randomized to receive eight cycles of either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF) or methotrexate and 5-FU (MF) chemotherapy. Two hundred six of these patients were subsequently rerandomized to receive either no further treatment or adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirty-five patients withdrew after randomization, including 34 who declined to receive radiotherapy. Radiation therapy consisted of 4,500 cGy in 5 weeks to the chest wall and appropriate draining lymph nodes. Median follow-up from chemotherapy randomization is 45 months for patients in the CA arm and 53 months for those in the CMF/MF arm. The crude rate of local failure (chest wall or draining lymph node areas) as first site of failure for patients randomized to receive chemotherapy only was 14%; for those randomized to receive both chemotherapy and radiotherapy it was 5% (P = .03). For patients in the CMF/MF arm, the rate of local failure as the first site of failure was nearly the same for patients randomized to chemotherapy only as for those randomized to adjuvant radiotherapy as well (5% v 2%). For patients in the CA arm, the crude rate of local failure was 20% for patients randomized to receive chemotherapy only, and 6% for those randomized to both types of adjuvant treatment (P = .03). Among the 43 patients treated with CA who actually received radiotherapy, there was only one local failure, compared with 12 local failures among the 59 patients (20%) who actually did not receive radiotherapy (P = .007). No significant difference was seen in disease-free survival or overall survival in either the CA or the CMF/MF arm between patients randomized to receive radiation therapy and those randomized to no further treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对于接受乳房切除术和辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者,辅助放疗的应用一直存在争议。为了评估在这种情况下辅助放疗的必要性和有效性,我们回顾了510例T1-T3期肿瘤且病理检查淋巴结阳性或肿瘤大于5 cm且淋巴结阴性并接受辅助化疗患者的治疗结果。有四个或更多阳性淋巴结或至少一个阳性尖淋巴结的患者被随机分配接受五个或十个周期的环磷酰胺/阿霉素(阿德里亚实验室,俄亥俄州哥伦布市)(CA)化疗,有一至三个阳性淋巴结或可手术切除的大于5 cm肿瘤且病理检查淋巴结阴性的患者被随机分配接受八个周期的环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)(CMF)或甲氨蝶呤和5-FU(MF)化疗。其中206例患者随后被再次随机分组,分别接受不再进一步治疗或辅助放疗。35例患者在随机分组后退出,其中34例拒绝接受放疗。放疗方案为在5周内对胸壁和相应引流淋巴结给予4500 cGy照射。从化疗随机分组开始计算,CA组患者的中位随访时间为45个月,CMF/MF组患者为53个月。仅接受化疗的患者中,作为首个复发部位的局部复发(胸壁或引流淋巴结区域)粗发生率为14%;接受化疗和放疗的患者中,该发生率为5%(P = 0.03)。在CMF/MF组中,仅接受化疗的患者和接受辅助放疗的患者作为首个复发部位的局部复发率几乎相同(5%对2%)。在CA组中,仅接受化疗的患者局部复发粗发生率为20%,接受两种辅助治疗的患者为6%(P = 0.03)。在实际接受放疗的43例接受CA治疗的患者中,仅出现1例局部复发,而在实际未接受放疗的59例患者(20%)中有12例局部复发(P = 0.007)。在CA组或CMF/MF组中,接受放疗的患者与不再接受进一步治疗的患者相比,无病生存期或总生存期均无显著差异。(摘要截断于400字)