• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Basic study on the rectangular numeric keys for touch screen.

作者信息

Harada H, Katsuura T, Kikuchi Y

机构信息

Department of Ergonomics, Faculty of Engineering, Chiba University, Japan.

出版信息

J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1997 Jun;26(1):77-82.

PMID:10901992
Abstract

The present study was conducted to examine the optimum inter-key spacing of numeric rectangular keys for touch screens. Six male students (22-25 years old) and three female students (21-24 years old) participated in the experiment. Each subject performed the data entry task using rectangular keys of touch devices. These keys were arranged in both horizontal and vertical layouts. The sizes of the rectangular keys in both layouts were 12 x 21 mm and 15 x 39 mm, and each of the inter-key spacing of each key was 0, 3, 6, 12 and 21 mm. The response time with inter-key spacing of 3 mm was significantly faster than with the inter-key spacing of 0, 12 and 21 mm (p < 0.05). Keys of vertical position produced faster response time than that of horizontal position. The subjective ratings showed that the inter-key spacing of 6 mm was significantly better than the inter-key spacing of 0, 3, 12 and 21 mm (p < 0.05).

摘要

相似文献

1
Basic study on the rectangular numeric keys for touch screen.
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1997 Jun;26(1):77-82.
2
Fundamental study on the size and inter-key spacing of numeric keys for touch screen.触摸屏数字键大小及键间距的基础研究
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1996 Dec;25(2):167-74.
3
Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference.站在信息亭前:按键大小和间距对触摸屏数字键盘性能及用户偏好的影响。
Ergonomics. 2004 Oct 22;47(13):1406-23. doi: 10.1080/00140130410001724228.
4
Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment.越野移动环境下办公应用中指点设备的可用性
Appl Ergon. 2008 Nov;39(6):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
5
Task-specific performance effects with different numeric keypad layouts.不同数字小键盘布局的任务特定性能影响。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jul;45(4):917-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
6
The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics, Part 2: Vertical spacing.键盘按键间距对打字速度、错误率、可用性和生物力学的影响,第 2 部分:垂直间距。
Hum Factors. 2014 Jun;56(4):752-9. doi: 10.1177/0018720813502524.
7
Performance study on touch-pens size in three screen tasks.三种屏幕任务中触控笔尺寸的性能研究。
Appl Ergon. 2006 Mar;37(2):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.05.011. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
8
Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.风湿病诊所中的触摸屏计算机系统提供了一种可靠且用户友好的方式,用于收集类风湿性关节炎患者的生活质量和治疗结果数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Jan;45(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei100. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
9
Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job.触摸屏幕或转动旋钮:为这项工作选择最佳设备。
Hum Factors. 2005 Summer;47(2):271-88. doi: 10.1518/0018720054679452.
10
Naive judgements of stimulus-response compatibility.对刺激-反应相容性的天真判断。
Ergonomics. 2010 Sep;53(9):1061-71. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.502254.