Suppr超能文献

远程教育。第3部分。对远程学习学生的评估与反馈。

Distance education. Part 3. Assessment of and feedback to students at a distance.

作者信息

Piterman L, Parer M, Schattner P, Laerum E, McCall L

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Monash University.

出版信息

Aust Fam Physician. 2000 Apr;29 Suppl 1:14-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of students at distance, in a course with over 20 units (subjects), provides special challenges in providing timely, accurate and detailed feedback both formatively and summatively.

METHOD

A description of assessment practices including reflective journals, essays, critical appraisal of literature, case studies or teaching presentations in video and written format, clinical audits, and large research projects is provided. The impact of a multitude of criterion-referenced methods of students, teachers and administrative services as well as quality assurance issues are measured.

CONCLUSION

Students preferred multiple levels of formative and summative assessment using criterion referencing to exams. These methods were thought to be contextually relevant to clinical practice and examined knowledge, cognition and performance appropriately. Length of assessment task, difficulty with English as a second language and lack of detail or clarity on written feedback posed problems for a number of students. Quality assurance procedures have been put into place to rectify some of these problems.

摘要

引言

在一门包含20多个单元(科目)的课程中,对远程学习的学生进行评估,在形成性和总结性方面及时、准确且详细地提供反馈会带来特殊挑战。

方法

介绍了评估实践,包括反思日志、论文、文献批判性评价、视频和书面形式的案例研究或教学展示、临床审计以及大型研究项目。衡量了多种基于标准的方法对学生、教师和行政服务的影响以及质量保证问题。

结论

学生更喜欢使用基于标准的评估而非考试进行多层次的形成性和总结性评估。这些方法被认为与临床实践相关,并能恰当地考查知识、认知和表现。评估任务的时长、英语作为第二语言的困难以及书面反馈缺乏细节或清晰度给一些学生带来了问题。已实施质量保证程序来纠正其中一些问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验