• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[大学间博士生指导情况的比较——晋升程序是否应该改变?]

[An interuniversity comparison of the supervision of doctoral candidates--should the promotion procedures be changed?].

作者信息

Kock N, Gauer I C, Busch L C, Kirchner H

机构信息

Institut für Immunologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000 Jun 9;125(23):724-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024469.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1024469
PMID:10902504
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There are only few investigations on supervision of medical dissertations that allow a comparison between different universities. This article discusses how the medical dissertation can be incorporated into a new medical curriculum.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all medical students in Lübeck who wrote dissertations in 1998. It contained 28 questions on duration, supervision, impact on medical studies and possible changes in the dissertation process. The data were compared statistically to previous studies.

RESULTS

70 questionnaires could be evaluated (63%) which allowed a comparison with studies in Hannover and Erlangen-Nürnberg. The Lübeck students assessed their supervision to be significantly better, they worked more frequently on experimental topics and data of their research were published more often than was the case in the other two institutions. The students regularly needed one extra semester for their dissertation, especially those working on experimental topics. Those who wrote dissertations expressed criticism of the dissertation process: only one third were in favour of making no change in the process. When asked to suggest possible improvements they proposed having a central facility for the announcement of dissertation subjects and one free semester to work solely on the dissertation.

CONCLUSION

In order to evaluate and compare supervision of dissertations, a comparable questionnaire should be used by all medical universities. If the medical curriculum is changed, the dissertation either has to be firmly integrated in the curriculum or it should be undertaken after completion of the studies.

摘要

背景与目的

关于医学博士论文指导情况的调查较少,尚缺乏不同大学之间的比较研究。本文探讨如何将医学博士论文纳入新的医学课程体系。

方法

向吕贝克市所有在1998年撰写博士论文的医学生发放问卷。问卷包含28个问题,涉及论文撰写时长、指导情况、对医学学习的影响以及论文撰写过程中可能出现的变化等方面。将所得数据与以往研究进行统计学比较。

结果

共收回70份有效问卷(回收率63%),可用于与汉诺威和埃尔朗根-纽伦堡的研究进行比较。吕贝克的学生认为他们得到的指导显著更好,他们更频繁地从事实验性课题研究,且其研究数据发表的频率高于其他两所院校。学生完成博士论文通常需要额外一个学期的时间,尤其是从事实验性课题研究的学生。撰写博士论文的学生对论文撰写过程提出了批评:只有三分之一的学生赞成维持现状。当被问及可能的改进建议时,他们提议设立一个集中发布博士论文课题的机构,并设置一个专门用于撰写博士论文的自由学期。

结论

为了评估和比较博士论文的指导情况,所有医科大学应使用可比的问卷。如果医学课程体系发生变化,博士论文要么必须牢固地融入课程体系,要么应在学业完成后进行。

相似文献

1
[An interuniversity comparison of the supervision of doctoral candidates--should the promotion procedures be changed?].[大学间博士生指导情况的比较——晋升程序是否应该改变?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000 Jun 9;125(23):724-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024469.
2
[The path to "Doctor of Medicine"--how do doctoral candidates evaluate their dissertation?].通往“医学博士”之路——博士研究生如何评价自己的博士论文?
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1998 Mar 27;123(13):375-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023974.
3
["Doctor" without being an M.D.--how do non-graduate MDs view medical dissertations?].没有医学博士学位的“医生”——非研究生学历的医学博士如何看待医学博士论文?
Gesundheitswesen. 1999 May;61(5):255-9.
4
[Medical dissertation: differences between successful and aborted research projects].[医学博士论文:成功与失败的研究项目之间的差异]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002 Jun 14;127(24):1307-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32193.
5
[The medical dissertation--no definitive model. Results of a survey about obtaining a doctorate contradict frequently stated opinions].[医学博士论文——无固定模式。关于获得博士学位的一项调查结果与常见观点相悖]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003 Dec 5;128(49):2583-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-45206.
6
[The motivation to become a medical doctor - doctoral students in a formal academic study program compared with those pursuing their doctorate independently].[成为医学博士的动机——正规学术研究项目中的博士生与独立攻读博士学位者的比较]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Apr;136(17):876-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275820. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
7
[On the way to becoming an MD (Dr. med.): What kind of support do doctoral students need? Part 2: Establishing the program].[在成为医学博士(Dr. med.)的道路上:博士生需要何种支持?第二部分:制定计划]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;110-111:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
[On the way to becoming an MD (Dr. med.): What kind of support do doctoral students need? Part 1: Survey and development of a program].[通往医学博士(Dr. med.)之路:博士生需要何种支持?第一部分:调查与项目开发]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;110-111:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
[The German academic degree "Dr. med." is better than its reputation. Results of a questionnaire of doctoral students].[德国学术学位“医学博士”比其声誉更佳。博士生问卷调查结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Nov;137(45):2311-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327241. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
10
Criteria for the successful completion of medical dissertations - A multicenter study.医学博士论文成功完成的标准——一项多中心研究。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27(3):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma000682. Epub 2010 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges for Better thesis supervision.提升论文指导质量面临的挑战。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014 May 10;28:32. eCollection 2014.
2
Dr. med.--obsolete? A cross sectional survey to investigate the perception and acceptance of the German medical degree.医学博士——过时了吗?一项横断面调查,旨在探究对德国医学学位的认知与接受度。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014 Aug 15;31(3):Doc30. doi: 10.3205/zma000922. eCollection 2014.
3
Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育阶段科学研究的益处与陷阱。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27(5):Doc72. doi: 10.3205/zma000709. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
4
Criteria for the successful completion of medical dissertations - A multicenter study.医学博士论文成功完成的标准——一项多中心研究。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27(3):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma000682. Epub 2010 May 17.