Ding G X, Cygler J E, Kwok C B
Fraser Valley Cancer Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Surrey, Canada.
Med Phys. 2000 Jun;27(6):1217-25. doi: 10.1118/1.598999.
We compare the results of absorbed dose determined at reference conditions according to the AAPM TG-21 dose calibration protocol and the new AAPM TG-51 protocol. The AAPM TG-21 protocol for absorbed dose calibration is based on ionization chambers having exposure calibration factors for 60Co gamma rays, N(x). The new AAPM TG-51 dosimetry protocol for absorbed dose calibration is based on ionization chambers having 60Co absorbed dose-to-water calibration factor, N60Co(D,w). This study shows that the dose changes are within 1% for a cobalt beam, 0.5% for photon energies of 6 and 18 MV, and 2%-3% for electron beams with energies of 6 to 20 MeV. The chamber primary calibration factors, Nx and N60Co(D,w), are traceable to the Canadian primary standards laboratory (NRCC). We also present estimated dose changes between the two protocols when calibration factors are traceable to NIST in the United States.
我们比较了根据美国医学物理师协会(AAPM)TG - 21剂量校准协议和新的AAPM TG - 51协议在参考条件下确定的吸收剂量结果。AAPM TG - 21吸收剂量校准协议基于具有针对60Co伽马射线的照射校准因子N(x)的电离室。新的AAPM TG - 51吸收剂量校准剂量学协议基于具有60Co水吸收剂量校准因子N60Co(D,w)的电离室。本研究表明,对于钴束,剂量变化在1%以内;对于6和18 MV的光子能量,剂量变化在0.5%以内;对于能量为6至20 MeV的电子束,剂量变化在2% - 3%以内。电离室的初级校准因子Nx和N60Co(D,w)可追溯至加拿大初级标准实验室(NRCC)。我们还给出了在校准因子可追溯至美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)时,两种协议之间的估计剂量变化。