• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较保乳治疗与乳房切除术的随机试验的长期结果:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织10801试验

Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

作者信息

van Dongen J A, Voogd A C, Fentiman I S, Legrand C, Sylvester R J, Tong D, van der Schueren E, Helle P A, van Zijl K, Bartelink H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 19;92(14):1143-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143
PMID:10904087
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has been shown to be as effective as mastectomy in the treatment of tumors 2 cm or smaller. However, evidence of its efficacy, over the long term, in patients with tumors larger than 2 cm is limited. From May 1980 to May 1986, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer carried out a randomized, multicenter trial comparing BCT with modified radical mastectomy for patients with tumors up to 5 cm. In this analysis, we investigated whether the treatments resulted in different overall survival, time to distant metastasis, or time to locoregional recurrence.

METHODS

Of 868 eligible breast cancer patients randomly assigned to the BCT arm or to the modified radical mastectomy arm, 80% had a tumor of 2.1-5 cm. BCT comprised lumpectomy with an attempted margin of 1 cm of healthy tissue and complete axillary clearance, followed by radiotherapy to the breast and a supplementary dose to the tumor bed. The median follow-up was 13.4 years. All P values are two-sided.

RESULTS

At 10 years, there was no difference between the two groups in overall survival (66% for the mastectomy patients and 65% for the BCT patients; P =.11) or in their distant metastasis-free rates (66% for the mastectomy patients and 61% for the BCT patients; P =.24). The rate of locoregional recurrence (occurring before or at the same time as distant metastasis) at 10 years did show a statistically significant difference (12% of the mastectomy and 20% of the BCT patients; P =. 01).

CONCLUSIONS

BCT and mastectomy demonstrate similar survival rates in a trial in which the great majority of the patients had stage II breast cancer.

摘要

背景

保乳治疗(BCT)已被证明在治疗2厘米及以下肿瘤方面与乳房切除术效果相同。然而,其对大于2厘米肿瘤患者的长期疗效证据有限。1980年5月至1986年5月,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织开展了一项随机、多中心试验,比较BCT与改良根治性乳房切除术对肿瘤最大达5厘米患者的疗效。在本分析中,我们研究了这两种治疗方法是否导致不同的总生存率、远处转移时间或局部区域复发时间。

方法

868例符合条件的乳腺癌患者被随机分配至BCT组或改良根治性乳房切除术组,其中80%的患者肿瘤大小为2.1 - 5厘米。BCT包括肿块切除术,切缘距健康组织1厘米,并进行腋窝淋巴结清扫,随后对乳房进行放疗,并对瘤床追加剂量。中位随访时间为13.4年。所有P值均为双侧。

结果

10年时,两组在总生存率(乳房切除术患者为66%,BCT患者为65%;P = 0.11)或无远处转移率(乳房切除术患者为66%,BCT患者为61%;P = 0.24)方面无差异。10年时局部区域复发率(在远处转移之前或同时发生)确实存在统计学显著差异(乳房切除术患者为12%,BCT患者为20%;P = 0.01)。

结论

在一项大多数患者为II期乳腺癌的试验中,BCT和乳房切除术显示出相似的生存率。

相似文献

1
Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.比较保乳治疗与乳房切除术的随机试验的长期结果:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织10801试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 19;92(14):1143-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143.
2
Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial.保乳治疗与乳房切除术治疗 I 期- II 期乳腺癌的比较:EORTC 10801 期随机试验 20 年随访结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Apr;13(4):412-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70042-6. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
3
Increased risk of locoregional recurrence for women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy compared with breast-conserving therapy.与保乳治疗相比,改良根治性乳房切除术未行辅助放疗的 T1-2N0 三阴性乳腺癌女性患者局部区域复发风险增加。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 20;29(21):2852-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.4714. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
4
[Conservative therapy of I and II stage breast cancer--successful alternative to modified radical mastectomy].[Ⅰ、Ⅱ期乳腺癌的保守治疗——改良根治性乳房切除术的成功替代方案]
Vopr Onkol. 2001;47(1):45-8.
5
Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancer.影响可手术乳腺癌保乳治疗后局部复发、生存及挽救性治疗结果的因素:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)10801试验,I期和II期TNM乳腺癌保乳治疗与乳房切除术的比较
Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A(4-5):801-5. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90118-l.
6
Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial.乳房切除术与保乳治疗早期乳腺癌的18年结果:美国国立癌症研究所随机试验
Cancer. 2003 Aug 15;98(4):697-702. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11580.
7
Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌乳房切除术与保乳治疗的成本比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Mar 21;93(6):447-55. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.6.447.
8
Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results.保乳治疗与乳房切除术治疗原发性乳腺癌的随机试验:更新结果的汇总分析。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun;28(3):289-94. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000156922.58631.d7.
9
Breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy in T1-2N2 stage breast cancer: a population-based study on 10-year overall, relative, and distant metastasis-free survival in 3071 patients.T1-2N2期乳腺癌保乳治疗与乳房切除术的比较:一项基于人群的研究,涉及3071例患者的10年总生存率、相对生存率和无远处转移生存率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Dec;160(3):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4012-8. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
10
[Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage invasive breast cancer: traditional clinical features and biomarkers].[早期浸润性乳腺癌治疗中的循证放疗:传统临床特征与生物标志物]
Magy Onkol. 2009 Mar;53(1):7-14. doi: 10.1556/MOnkol.53.2009.1.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Surgery at a Tertiary Center in Greece: Clinicopathological Associations and Patient Outcomes.希腊一家三级医疗中心的乳腺癌手术:临床病理关联与患者预后
Cureus. 2025 Jul 8;17(7):e87546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87546. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Optimizing Outcomes in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.优化肿瘤整形保乳手术的治疗效果
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4806. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134806.
3
National Survey on Attitudes of Brazilian Breast Surgeons Regarding Oncoplastic Surgery: Success of a Training Model.巴西乳腺外科医生对肿瘤整形手术态度的全国性调查:一种培训模式的成效
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17435-1.
4
Oncologic Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Colombian Cancer Center: An Observational, Analytical, Retrospective Cohort Study.哥伦比亚癌症中心保乳手术的肿瘤学结局:一项观察性、分析性、回顾性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;17(7):1131. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071131.
5
Oncological outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a contemporary multicenter cohort.当代多中心队列中,新辅助化疗后保乳手术与乳房切除术的肿瘤学结局
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 16;15(1):9032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93491-7.
6
Comparison of Survival Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery Plus Radiotherapy with Mastectomy in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Less Is More?早期乳腺癌患者保乳手术加放疗与乳房切除术生存结果的比较:少即是多?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 9;17(4):591. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040591.
7
Racial and ethnic disparities in conversion to mastectomy following lumpectomy.保乳术后乳房切除术转化率的种族和族裔差异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 May;211(1):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07625-6. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
8
L-ICG as an optical agent to improve intraoperative margin detection in breast-conserving surgery: a prospective study.L-吲哚菁绿作为一种光学试剂用于改善保乳手术中的术中切缘检测:一项前瞻性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Apr;210(3):709-718. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07609-6. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
9
Adipogenesis of bioabsorbable implants under irradiation in a rodent model.啮齿动物模型中生物可吸收植入物在辐射下的脂肪生成
Regen Ther. 2024 Oct 30;26:990-998. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2024.10.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Living Flat: Stories from Women of Color After Mastectomy.《直面生活:乳房切除术后有色人种女性的故事》
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan;32(1):104-114. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16337-y. Epub 2024 Oct 15.