Cavalletto L, Chemello L, Donada C, Casarin P, Belussi F, Bernardinello E, Marino F, Pontisso P, Gatta A, Alberti A
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinica Medica 5, Padova University, Italy.
J Hepatol. 2000 Jul;33(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80169-5.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In chronic hepatitis C, interferon-alpha (alpha-IFN) and ribavirin combination therapy improves sustained response compared to alpha-IFN monotherapy, both in naive patients and in previous alpha-IFN relapsers, but the efficacy of such therapy remains limited in non-responder cases. The aim of this study was to assess whether the pattern of response to alpha-IFN alone may predict sustained response to combination therapy during retreatment.
Fifty previous alpha-IFN relapsers and 50 previous alpha-IFN non-responders were retreated with a high alpha-IFN dose (6 MU/thrice weekly for 2 months; induction phase) and then randomised to continue with alpha-IFN alone (3 MU/thrice weekly) or to receive combination therapy (3 MU/thrice weekly of alpha-IFN and 1000-1200 mg/daily of ribavirin) for an additional 6 months according to the biochemical response to alpha-IFN shown after the induction phase. All patients were also evaluated for virological and histological response.
Eleven of 25 (44%) relapsers treated with combination therapy and 4/25 (16%) treated with alpha-IFN alone achieved a sustained response. The corresponding figures among non-responders were 1/25 (4%) and 0/25, respectively. Among 26 patients with a complete ALT and HCV-RNA response after 2 months of alpha-IFN, sustained response was seen in 11/14 (79%) treated with combination therapy and in 4/12 (33%) treated with alpha-IFN alone (p=0.05). On the other hand, of 74 cases still HCV-RNA positive after 2 months of alpha-IFN alone, biochemical and virological end of therapy response was better with combination therapy (11/36; 30.5%) compared to alpha-IFN alone (4/38; 10.5%), but only one patient developed a sustained response (1/36; 3%).
The retreatment with a 6-month combination therapy was associated with a high rate of sustained response only in patients showing a complete biochemical and virological response to alpha-IFN alone. Longer retreatment with combination therapy may be needed to achieve a sustained response in patients without a prompt virological response to alpha-IFN.
背景/目的:在慢性丙型肝炎中,与单用α-干扰素(α-IFN)治疗相比,α-IFN与利巴韦林联合治疗可提高初治患者和既往α-IFN治疗复发患者的持续应答率,但在无应答患者中,这种治疗的疗效仍然有限。本研究的目的是评估单用α-IFN时的应答模式是否可预测再次治疗期间联合治疗的持续应答情况。
50例既往α-IFN治疗复发患者和50例既往α-IFN治疗无应答患者接受高剂量α-IFN治疗(6MU/每周3次,共2个月;诱导期),然后根据诱导期后显示的对α-IFN的生化应答情况,随机分为继续单用α-IFN(3MU/每周3次)或接受联合治疗(3MU/每周3次的α-IFN和1000 - 1200mg/每日的利巴韦林),再治疗6个月。所有患者还评估了病毒学和组织学应答情况。
接受联合治疗的25例复发患者中有11例(44%)获得持续应答,单用α-IFN治疗的25例中有4例(16%)获得持续应答。无应答患者中的相应数字分别为1/25(4%)和0/25。在接受α-IFN治疗2个月后ALT和HCV-RNA完全应答的26例患者中,联合治疗的11/14(79%)获得持续应答,单用α-IFN治疗的4/12(33%)获得持续应答(p = 0.05)。另一方面,在单用α-IFN治疗2个月后仍HCV-RNA阳性的74例患者中,联合治疗的生化和病毒学治疗结束时应答情况优于单用α-IFN治疗(11/36;30.5%)(4/38;10.5%),但只有1例患者获得持续应答(1/36;3%)。
仅在对单用α-IFN显示完全生化和病毒学应答的患者中,6个月联合再治疗与高持续应答率相关。对于对α-IFN无快速病毒学应答的患者,可能需要更长时间的联合再治疗以获得持续应答。