• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转化生长因子-β细胞周期阻滞途径对c-Myc和MDM-2的不同敏感性。

Different sensitivity of the transforming growth factor-beta cell cycle arrest pathway to c-Myc and MDM-2.

作者信息

Blain S W, Massagué J

机构信息

Cell Biology Program and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 13;275(41):32066-70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006496200.

DOI:10.1074/jbc.M006496200
PMID:10906337
Abstract

Recently, the oncoprotein MDM-2 was implicated in the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) growth inhibitory pathway by the finding that prolonged, constitutive expression of MDM-2 in mink lung epithelial cells could overcome the antiproliferative effect of TGF-beta (Sun, P., Dong, P., Dai, K., Hannon, G. J., and Beach, D. (1998) Science 282, 2270-2272). However, using Mv1Lu cells conditionally expressing MDM-2, we found that MDM-2 does not overcome TGF-beta-mediated growth arrest. No detectable changes were observed in various TGF-beta responses, including cell cycle arrest, activation of transcriptional reporters, and TGF-beta-dependent Smad2/3 nuclear accumulation. This finding was in direct contrast to the effect of forcing c-Myc expression, a bona fide member of the TGF-beta growth inhibitory pathway, which renders cells refractory to TGF-beta-induced cell cycle arrest. Our results suggest that an MDM-2-dependent increase in cell cycle progression may allow the acquisition of additional mutations over time and that these alterations then allow cells to evade a TGF-beta-mediated growth arrest. Our conclusion is that, whereas c-Myc down-regulation by TGF-beta is a required event in the cell cycle arrest response of epithelial cells, MDM-2 is not a direct participant in the normal TGF-beta antiproliferative response.

摘要

最近,癌蛋白MDM-2被认为参与了转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)的生长抑制途径,因为有研究发现,MDM-2在貂肺上皮细胞中的持续组成型表达能够克服TGF-β的抗增殖作用(Sun, P., Dong, P., Dai, K., Hannon, G. J., and Beach, D. (1998) Science 282, 2270 - 2272)。然而,利用条件性表达MDM-2的Mv1Lu细胞,我们发现MDM-2并不能克服TGF-β介导的生长停滞。在各种TGF-β反应中未观察到可检测到的变化,包括细胞周期停滞、转录报告基因的激活以及TGF-β依赖的Smad2/3核积累。这一发现与强制表达c-Myc的效果形成直接对比,c-Myc是TGF-β生长抑制途径的一个真正成员,它使细胞对TGF-β诱导的细胞周期停滞产生抗性。我们的结果表明,依赖MDM-2的细胞周期进程增加可能会随着时间的推移使细胞获得额外的突变,而这些改变随后会使细胞逃避TGF-β介导的生长停滞。我们的结论是,虽然TGF-β导致的c-Myc下调是上皮细胞周期停滞反应中的一个必要事件,但MDM-2并不是正常TGF-β抗增殖反应的直接参与者。

相似文献

1
Different sensitivity of the transforming growth factor-beta cell cycle arrest pathway to c-Myc and MDM-2.转化生长因子-β细胞周期阻滞途径对c-Myc和MDM-2的不同敏感性。
J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 13;275(41):32066-70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006496200.
2
Interaction of the Ski oncoprotein with Smad3 regulates TGF-beta signaling.Ski癌蛋白与Smad3的相互作用调节转化生长因子-β信号传导。
Mol Cell. 1999 Oct;4(4):499-509. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80201-4.
3
Resistance to transforming growth factor-beta occurs in the presence of normal Smad activation.在正常Smad激活的情况下会出现对转化生长因子-β的抗性。
Surgery. 2002 Aug;132(2):310-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.126097.
4
SnoN is a cell type-specific mediator of transforming growth factor-beta responses.Ski相关核蛋白(SnoN)是转化生长因子-β反应的细胞类型特异性介质。
J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 1;280(13):13037-46. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409367200. Epub 2005 Jan 27.
5
Smad pathway-specific transcriptional regulation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(WAF1/Cip1).细胞周期抑制剂p21(WAF1/Cip1)的Smad信号通路特异性转录调控
J Cell Physiol. 2005 Jul;204(1):260-72. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20304.
6
Insulin-like growth factor-I inhibits transcriptional responses of transforming growth factor-beta by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent suppression of the activation of Smad3 but not Smad2.胰岛素样生长因子-I通过磷脂酰肌醇3-激酶/蛋白激酶B依赖性抑制Smad3而非Smad2的激活来抑制转化生长因子-β的转录反应。
J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 3;278(40):38342-51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304583200. Epub 2003 Jul 21.
7
Loss of c-myc repression coincides with ovarian cancer resistance to transforming growth factor beta growth arrest independent of transforming growth factor beta/Smad signaling.c-myc抑制作用的丧失与卵巢癌对转化生长因子β生长停滞的抗性相关,且不依赖于转化生长因子β/Smad信号传导。
Cancer Res. 2003 Mar 15;63(6):1413-9.
8
Inability of transforming growth factor-beta to cause SnoN degradation leads to resistance to transforming growth factor-beta-induced growth arrest in esophageal cancer cells.转化生长因子-β无法导致SnoN降解,从而使食管癌细胞对转化生长因子-β诱导的生长停滞产生抗性。
Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 1;65(11):4782-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4354.
9
Direct interaction of c-Myc with Smad2 and Smad3 to inhibit TGF-beta-mediated induction of the CDK inhibitor p15(Ink4B).c-Myc与Smad2和Smad3直接相互作用以抑制TGF-β介导的细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂p15(Ink4B)的诱导。
Mol Cell. 2002 Jan;9(1):133-43. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00430-0.
10
Akt interacts directly with Smad3 to regulate the sensitivity to TGF-beta induced apoptosis.Akt直接与Smad3相互作用,以调节对转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)诱导的细胞凋亡的敏感性。
Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Apr;6(4):366-72. doi: 10.1038/ncb1117.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-Müllerian Hormone Expression in Endometrial Cancer Tissue.抗 Müllerian 激素在子宫内膜癌组织中的表达。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 15;20(6):1325. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061325.
2
Nuclear CDKs drive Smad transcriptional activation and turnover in BMP and TGF-beta pathways.细胞核周期蛋白依赖性激酶驱动骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)和转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)信号通路中的Smad转录激活和周转。
Cell. 2009 Nov 13;139(4):757-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.035.
3
Recent advances in validating MDM2 as a cancer target.MDM2 作为癌症靶点的验证研究进展。
Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2009 Oct;9(8):882-903. doi: 10.2174/187152009789124628.
4
The RING finger domain of MDM2 is essential for MDM2-mediated TGF-beta resistance.MDM2的环状结构域对于MDM2介导的转化生长因子-β抗性至关重要。
Mol Biol Cell. 2007 Jun;18(6):2367-77. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-09-0844. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
5
A direct intersection between p53 and transforming growth factor beta pathways targets chromatin modification and transcription repression of the alpha-fetoprotein gene.p53与转化生长因子β信号通路之间的直接交汇作用靶向甲胎蛋白基因的染色质修饰和转录抑制。
Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;25(3):1200-12. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.3.1200-1212.2005.