Suppr超能文献

1998年全国牛肉嫩度调查

National Beef Tenderness Survey-1998.

作者信息

Brooks J C, Belew J B, Griffin D B, Gwartney B L, Hale D S, Henning W R, Johnson D D, Morgan J B, Parrish F C, Reagan J O, Savell J W

机构信息

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2000 Jul;78(7):1852-60. doi: 10.2527/2000.7871852x.

Abstract

Fifty-six retail stores representing 15 retail chains and 14 foodservice facilities in eight U.S. cities were sampled to determine the tenderness of beef steaks at retail and foodservice levels based on Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS) values and consumer evaluation panels. Retail consumer panels were conducted at five universities. Each retail and foodservice steak was evaluated using 10-point scales. Steaks were divided into the following quality groups for statistical analysis: Prime, Top Choice, Choice, Select, and Lean or No Roll. Quality group had no effect on WBS values of retail clod, chuck roll, top round, bottom round, eye of round, top loin, top sirloin, or ribeye steaks but did (P < .05) affect values for the T-bone/porterhouse. The percentages of retail top round, eye of round, and bottom round steaks with a WBS force > 3.9 kg were 39.6, 55.9, and 68.0, respectively. Foodservice ribeye, top loin, and top sirloin steaks had WBS values less than 3.4 kg for all quality groups, with Prime ribeye steaks having lower (P < .05) WBS values than ribeyes from the other quality groups. With the exception of the retail ribeye steak, quality group did not affect consumer sensory ratings of retail and foodservice steaks. Average postfabrication aging times were 32 d for foodservice subprimals and 19 d for retail cut subprimals. These data indicate that improvements in the tenderness of retail cuts from the round are needed. Finally, quality group had little or no effect on consumer sensory evaluations and WBS values of retail and foodservice steaks used in this study.

摘要

在美国八个城市,抽取了代表15个零售连锁的56家零售店以及14家食品服务机构,基于沃纳 - 布拉茨勒剪切力(WBS)值和消费者评估小组来确定零售和食品服务层面牛排的嫩度。在五所大学进行了零售消费者小组调查。每个零售和食品服务牛排都使用10分制进行评估。牛排被分为以下质量组进行统计分析:特级、精选级、一级、合格级以及特瘦或无脂肪卷级。质量组对零售的颈肉、肩胛卷肉、上腰部、下腰部、圆里脊、上腰部、上后腰肉或肋眼牛排的WBS值没有影响,但对丁骨牛排/上腰部牛排的值有影响(P < 0.05)。WBS力> 3.9千克的零售上腰部、圆里脊和下腰部牛排的百分比分别为39.6%、55.9%和68.0%。所有质量组的食品服务肋眼牛排、上腰部牛排和上后腰肉牛排的WBS值均小于3.4千克,特级肋眼牛排的WBS值低于(P < 0.05)其他质量组的肋眼牛排。除了零售肋眼牛排外,质量组对零售和食品服务牛排的消费者感官评分没有影响。食品服务二级牛肉切块的平均加工后熟化时间为32天,零售切块二级牛肉的平均加工后熟化时间为19天。这些数据表明,需要提高来自牛后腿肉的零售切块的嫩度。最后,质量组对本研究中使用的零售和食品服务牛排的消费者感官评价和WBS值几乎没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验