Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD000485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000485.
Among women with early breast cancer, the effects of ovarian ablation on recurrence and death have been assessed by several randomised trials that now have long follow-up.
In this report, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group present their third 5-yearly systematic overview (meta-analysis), now with 15 years' follow-up.
Trial identification procedures for the EBCTCG overviews have been described elsewhere. See under "EBCTCG" in the Breast Cancer Collaborative Review Group module.
All properly randomised trials that began recruiting before 1990 which compared the ablation or suppression of ovarian function, sometimes with the addition of prednisone, versus no such adjuvant treatment for women with operable breast cancer. In practice, all the trials that can be reviewed here began before 1980, and all involved surgical or therapeutic ablation.
In 1995, information was sought on each patient in any randomised trial of ovarian ablation or suppression versus control that began before 1990. Data were obtained for 12 of the 13 studies that assessed ovarian ablation by irradiation or surgery, all of which began before 1980, but not for the four studies that assessed ovarian suppression by drugs, all of which began after 1985. Menopausal status was not consistently defined across trials; therefore, the main analyses are limited to women aged under 50 (rather than "premenopausal") when randomised. Oestrogen receptors were measured only in the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone.
Among 2102 women aged under 50 when randomised, most of whom would have been premenopausal at diagnosis, 1130 deaths and an additional 153 recurrences were reported. 15-year survival was highly significantly improved among those allocated ovarian ablation (52.4 vs 46.1%, 6.3 [SD 2.3] fewer deaths per 100 women, logrank 2p=0.001), as was recurrence-free survival (45.0 vs 39.0%, 2p=0.0007). The numbers of events were too small for any subgroup analyses to be reliable. The benefit was, however, significant both for those with ("node positive") and for those without ("node negative") axillary spread when diagnosed. In the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone, the benefit appeared smaller (even for women with oestrogen receptors detected on the primary tumour) than in the trials in the absence of chemotherapy (where the observed survival improvements were about six per 100 node-negative women and 12 per 100 node-positive women). Among 1354 women aged 50 or over when randomised, most of whom would have been perimenopausal or postmenopausal, there was only a non-significant improvement in survival and recurrence-free survival.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In women aged under 50 with early breast cancer, ablation of functioning ovaries significantly improves long-term survival, at least in the absence of chemotherapy. Further randomised evidence is needed on the additional effects of ovarian ablation in the presence of other adjuvant treatments, and to assess the relevance of hormone-receptor measurements.
在早期乳腺癌女性患者中,多项随机试验已对卵巢去势对复发和死亡的影响进行了评估,这些试验目前已有很长的随访期。
在本报告中,早期乳腺癌试验者协作组(Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group)展示了他们的第三次每5年进行一次的系统综述(荟萃分析),目前随访期为15年。
EBCTCG综述的试验识别程序已在其他地方进行了描述。见乳腺癌协作审查组模块中的“EBCTCG”。
所有在1990年之前开始招募的恰当随机试验,这些试验比较了卵巢功能的去势或抑制,有时联合泼尼松,与未对可手术乳腺癌女性进行此类辅助治疗的情况。实际上,这里可审查的所有试验均在1980年之前开始,且均涉及手术或治疗性去势。
1995年,在1990年之前开始的任何卵巢去势或抑制与对照的随机试验中,对每位患者的信息进行了收集。对13项通过放疗或手术评估卵巢去势的研究中的12项获取了数据,所有这些研究均在1980年之前开始,但对4项通过药物评估卵巢抑制的研究未获取数据,所有这些研究均在1985年之后开始。各试验对绝经状态的定义不一致;因此,主要分析限于随机分组时年龄小于50岁(而非“绝经前”)的女性。仅在去势加细胞毒性化疗与单纯相同化疗的试验中测量了雌激素受体。
在随机分组时年龄小于50岁的2102名女性中,其中大多数在诊断时可能处于绝经前,报告了1130例死亡和另外153例复发。接受卵巢去势的患者15年生存率显著提高(52.4%对46.1%,每100名女性死亡人数减少6.3[标准差2.3],对数秩检验p=0.001),无复发生存率也显著提高(45.0%对39.0%,p=0.0007)。事件数量过少,任何亚组分析都不可靠。然而,对于诊断时有腋窝转移(“淋巴结阳性”)和无腋窝转移(“淋巴结阴性”)的患者,获益均显著。在去势加细胞毒性化疗与单纯相同化疗的试验中,获益似乎比无化疗的试验中更小(即使对于原发肿瘤检测到雌激素受体的女性)(在无化疗的试验中,观察到的生存改善约为每100名淋巴结阴性女性6例,每100名淋巴结阳性女性12例)。在随机分组时年龄为50岁及以上的1354名女性中,其中大多数可能处于围绝经期或绝经后,生存和无复发生存仅略有改善且无统计学意义。
在年龄小于50岁的早期乳腺癌女性中,切除有功能的卵巢可显著提高长期生存率,至少在无化疗的情况下如此。需要进一步的随机证据来研究在存在其他辅助治疗时卵巢去势的额外效果,并评估激素受体测量的相关性。