Suppr超能文献

使用肽核酸夹从环境样品中亲和纯化DNA和RNA。

Affinity purification of DNA and RNA from environmental samples with peptide nucleic acid clamps.

作者信息

Chandler D P, Stults J R, Cebula S, Schuck B L, Weaver D W, Anderson K K, Egholm M, Brockman F J

机构信息

Environmental Microbiology Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Aug;66(8):3438-45. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3438-3445.2000.

Abstract

Bispeptide nucleic acids (bis-PNAs; PNA clamps), PNA oligomers, and DNA oligonucleotides were evaluated as affinity purification reagents for subfemtomolar 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and rRNA targets in soil, sediment, and industrial air filter nucleic acid extracts. Under low-salt hybridization conditions (10 mM NaPO(4), 5 mM disodium EDTA, and 0.025% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) a PNA clamp recovered significantly more target DNA than either PNA or DNA oligomers. The efficacy of PNA clamps and oligomers was generally enhanced in the presence of excess nontarget DNA and in a low-salt extraction-hybridization buffer. Under high-salt conditions (200 mM NaPO(4), 100 mM disodium EDTA, and 0.5% SDS), however, capture efficiencies with the DNA oligomer were significantly greater than with the PNA clamp and PNA oligomer. Recovery and detection efficiencies for target DNA concentrations of > or =100 pg were generally >20% but depended upon the specific probe, solution background, and salt condition. The DNA probe had a lower absolute detection limit of 100 fg of target (830 zM [1 zM = 10(-21) M]) in high-salt buffer. In the absence of exogenous DNA (e.g., soil background), neither the bis-PNA nor the PNA oligomer achieved the same absolute detection limit even under a more favorable low-salt hybridization condition. In the presence of a soil background, however, both PNA probes provided more sensitive absolute purification and detection (830 zM) than the DNA oligomer. In varied environmental samples, the rank order for capture probe performance in high-salt buffer was DNA > PNA > clamp. Recovery of 16S rRNA from environmental samples mirrored quantitative results for DNA target recovery, with the DNA oligomer generating more positive results than either the bis-PNA or PNA oligomer, but PNA probes provided a greater incidence of detection from environmental samples that also contained a higher concentration of nontarget DNA and RNA. Significant interactions between probe type and environmental sample indicate that the most efficacious capture system depends upon the particular sample type (and background nucleic acid concentration), target (DNA or RNA), and detection objective.

摘要

双肽核酸(双肽核酸;PNA夹)、PNA寡聚物和DNA寡核苷酸被评估为用于土壤、沉积物和工业空气过滤器核酸提取物中亚飞摩尔级16S核糖体DNA(rDNA)和rRNA靶标的亲和纯化试剂。在低盐杂交条件下(10 mM磷酸钠、5 mM乙二胺四乙酸二钠和0.025%十二烷基硫酸钠[SDS]),PNA夹回收的靶标DNA比PNA或DNA寡聚物显著更多。在存在过量非靶标DNA和低盐提取-杂交缓冲液的情况下,PNA夹和寡聚物的效果通常会增强。然而,在高盐条件下(200 mM磷酸钠、100 mM乙二胺四乙酸二钠和0.5% SDS),DNA寡聚物的捕获效率显著高于PNA夹和PNA寡聚物。对于浓度≥100 pg的靶标DNA,回收和检测效率通常>20%,但取决于特定探针、溶液背景和盐条件。DNA探针在高盐缓冲液中的绝对检测限较低,为100 fg靶标(830 zM [1 zM = 10⁻²¹ M])。在没有外源DNA(如土壤背景)的情况下,即使在更有利的低盐杂交条件下,双肽核酸和PNA寡聚物也无法达到相同的绝对检测限。然而,在存在土壤背景的情况下,两种PNA探针都比DNA寡聚物提供了更灵敏的绝对纯化和检测(830 zM)。在各种环境样品中,高盐缓冲液中捕获探针性能的排序为DNA > PNA > 夹。从环境样品中回收16S rRNA反映了DNA靶标回收的定量结果,DNA寡聚物产生的阳性结果比双肽核酸或PNA寡聚物更多,但PNA探针在也含有较高浓度非靶标DNA和RNA的环境样品中的检测发生率更高。探针类型与环境样品之间的显著相互作用表明,最有效的捕获系统取决于特定的样品类型(和背景核酸浓度)、靶标(DNA或RNA)和检测目标。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Molecular beacons of xeno-nucleic acid for detecting nucleic acid.用于检测核酸的异源核酸分子信标
Theranostics. 2013 May 5;3(6):395-408. doi: 10.7150/thno.5935. Print 2013.
8
PNA Technology.肽核酸技术
Mol Biotechnol. 2004 Mar;26(3):233-48. doi: 10.1385/MB:26:3:233.

本文引用的文献

4
Virus decay and its causes in coastal waters.沿海海域病毒衰减及其原因。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Jan;63(1):77-83. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.1.77-83.1997.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验