Ploin D, Chapuis F R, Stamm D, Robert J, David L, Chatelain P G, Dutau G, Floret D
Service d'Urgence et de Réanimation Pédiatrique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France.
Pediatrics. 2000 Aug;106(2 Pt 1):311-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.2.311.
Inhaled albuterol is the most frequently used bronchodilator for acute wheezing, and nebulization is the standard mode of delivery in hospital setting. However, recent guidelines consider spacer devices as an easier to use, and cost-saving alternative and recommend the high-dose metered-dose inhaler bronchodilator.
To demonstrate clinical equivalence between a spacer device and a nebulizer for albuterol administration.
Randomized, double-blind, parallel group equivalence trial.
Pediatric emergency wards at 2 tertiary teaching hospitals.
Sixty-four 12- to 60-month-old children with acute recurrent wheezing (32 per group).
Albuterol was administered through the spacer device (50 microg/kg) or through the nebulizer (150 microg/kg) and repeated 3 times at 20-minute intervals. Parents completed a questionnaire.
Pulmonary index, hospitalization, ease of use, acceptability, and pulse oximetry saturation.
The 90% confidence interval of the difference between treatment groups for the median absolute changes in pulmonary index values between T0 and T60 was [-1; +1] and was included in the equivalence interval [-1.5; +1.5]. Clinical improvement increased with time. Less than 10% of the children (3 in each group) required hospitalization (2 in each group attributable to treatment failure). Parents considered administration of albuterol using the spacer device easier (94%) and better accepted by their children (62%).
The efficacy of albuterol administered using the spacer device was equivalent to that of the nebulizer. Given its high tolerance, repeated 50-microg/kg doses of albuterol administered through the spacer device should be considered in hospital emergency departments as first-line therapy for wheezing.
吸入用沙丁胺醇是治疗急性喘息最常用的支气管扩张剂,雾化吸入是医院环境中的标准给药方式。然而,近期指南认为储雾罐是一种使用更便捷且节省成本的替代方式,并推荐使用高剂量定量吸入器支气管扩张剂。
证明在使用沙丁胺醇时储雾罐与雾化器的临床等效性。
随机、双盲、平行组等效性试验。
两家三级教学医院的儿科急诊病房。
64名12至60个月大的急性复发性喘息儿童(每组32名)。
通过储雾罐(50微克/千克)或雾化器(150微克/千克)给予沙丁胺醇,并每隔20分钟重复给药3次。家长填写问卷。
肺指数、住院情况、易用性、可接受性和脉搏血氧饱和度。
治疗组之间在T0至T60期间肺指数值的中位数绝对变化差异的90%置信区间为[-1; +1],并包含在等效区间[-1.5; +1.5]内。临床改善随时间增加。不到10%的儿童(每组3名)需要住院治疗(每组各有2名因治疗失败)。家长认为使用储雾罐给予沙丁胺醇更简便(94%),且孩子更容易接受(62%)。
使用储雾罐给予沙丁胺醇的疗效与雾化器相当。鉴于其高耐受性,在医院急诊科,通过储雾罐给予50微克/千克重复剂量的沙丁胺醇应被视为喘息的一线治疗方法。