Itoh K, Tsushima S, Tsukamoto E, Tamaki N
Department of Radiology, JR Sapporo Genenal Hospital, Japan.
Ann Nucl Med. 2000 Jun;14(3):143-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02987852.
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical validity of single-sample methods and gamma camera uptake methods with 99mTc-DTPA for the estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The study was performed in 50 patients with various degrees of renal function (29 males and 21 females; age 27-90 yrs; serum creatinine level 0.34-6.49 mg/dl). As a reference the "true" GFR (GFRt) was determined from plasma clearance by means of the two compartment model curve fitting 10 plasma samples. The GFRt of more than 30 ml/min in 46 patients was compared to the GFR which was estimated with 7 single-sample methods, two gamma camera uptake methods and 24-hour endogenous creatinine clearance (24hCcr). Close correlation was observed in all single-sample methods. The highest linear correlation was observed in the Christensen and Groth's method rewritten by Watson for a 180-min plasma sample (r = 0.991, see = 5.84 ml/min). The smallest random error was observed in the Groth and Aasted's method for a 180-min plasma (r = 0.989, see = 4.31 ml/min/1.73 m2). Our method was lowest in % absolute difference analysis (mean = 4.10%). The gamma camera uptake methods correlated significantly with the GFRt (r = 0.746-0.774), but were less reliable than any of the single-sample methods (see = 15.41 ml/min-19.14 ml/min). The lowest correlation was observed in the 24hCcr (r = 0.698, see = 50.76 ml/min/1.73 m2). The single-sample method was more accurate than the gamma camera method, and the gamma camera method was more accurate than 24hCcr. The single-sample method should be recommended for the accurate determination of the GFR with 99mTc-DTPA in a patient with mild to moderate renal dysfunction.
本研究的目的是评估采用99mTc-DTPA的单样本法和γ相机摄取法在估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)方面的临床有效性。该研究纳入了50例不同程度肾功能的患者(29例男性和21例女性;年龄27 - 90岁;血清肌酐水平0.34 - 6.49mg/dl)。作为参考,通过双室模型曲线拟合10份血浆样本,从血浆清除率测定“真实”GFR(GFRt)。将46例GFRt超过30ml/min的患者的GFRt与采用7种单样本法、两种γ相机摄取法和24小时内生肌酐清除率(24hCcr)估算的GFR进行比较。在所有单样本法中均观察到密切相关性。在Watson改写的Christensen和Groth法用于180分钟血浆样本时观察到最高的线性相关性(r = 0.991,SEE = 5.84ml/min)。在Groth和Aasted法用于180分钟血浆时观察到最小的随机误差(r = 0.989,SEE = 4.31ml/min/1.73m²)。在%绝对差异分析中我们的方法最低(均值 = 4.10%)。γ相机摄取法与GFRt显著相关(r = 0.746 - 0.774),但比任何单样本法可靠性更低(SEE = 15.41ml/min - 19.14ml/min)。在24hCcr中观察到最低的相关性(r = 0.698,SEE = 50.76ml/min/1.73m²)。单样本法比γ相机法更准确,且γ相机法比24hCcr更准确。对于轻至中度肾功能不全患者,采用99mTc-DTPA准确测定GFR时应推荐单样本法。