Gruson D, Hilbert G, Valentino R, Vargas F, Chene G, Bebear C, Allery A, Pigneux A, Gbikpi-Benissan G, Cardinaud J P
Division of Medical Intensive Care, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2224-30. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00007.
To analyze the impact of fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) on guiding the treatment and intensive care unit (ICU) clinical outcome in neutropenic patients with pulmonary infiltrates admitted to the ICU.
Prospective collection of data.
Medical ICU in a teaching hospital.
During a 6-yr period, we analyzed the results of 93 fiberoptic bronchoscopies plus BALs performed in 93 consecutive neutropenic ICU patients. We separated the patients into two groups according to the cause of neutropenia (high-dose chemotherapy [n = 41] or stem cell transplantation [SCT; n = 52]).
Of the 93 BALs, 53 were performed to evaluate diffuse infiltrates and 42 were performed on mechanically ventilated patients. Forty-nine percent of BALs (46 patients) were diagnostic, with a significantly better yield in ICU patients with high-dose chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (26 of 41 BALs). The number of cases of proven infectious pneumonia was significantly higher in this group of ICU neutropenic patients. In patients who underwent SCT, diffuse infiltrates were statistically correlated with a negative result of BAL. Twenty-six patients who underwent diagnostic BALs changed therapy. Sixteen complications (17%) occurred with only two intubations. The overall mortality rate in the ICU and the mortality rate in mechanically ventilated neutropenic patients were 71% and 93%, respectively. In neutropenic patients who underwent SCT, the mortality rate was statistically higher in patients in whom no diagnosis was established. Patients who had a diagnostic BAL that changed therapy did not have an increased probability of survival compared with patients who had a BAL that did not change therapy.
The use of routine diagnostic BAL in ICU neutropenic patients with pulmonary infiltrates is difficult to establish, even if BAL is helpful in the management of these critically ill patients. BAL in our ICU neutropenic patient population had an acceptable overall diagnostic yield (49%), which was higher in ICU patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Nevertheless, in the ICU, if BAL had a low complication rate, it had infrequently led to changed treatment and was not associated with improved patient survival.
分析纤维支气管镜检查及支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)对入住重症监护病房(ICU)的中性粒细胞减少伴肺部浸润患者的治疗指导作用及ICU临床结局的影响。
前瞻性数据收集。
一所教学医院的内科ICU。
在6年期间,我们分析了对93例连续入住ICU的中性粒细胞减少患者进行的93次纤维支气管镜检查及BAL的结果。我们根据中性粒细胞减少的原因将患者分为两组(高剂量化疗[n = 41]或干细胞移植[SCT;n = 52])。
在93次BAL中,53次用于评估弥漫性浸润,42次用于机械通气患者。49%的BAL(46例患者)具有诊断价值,在高剂量化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少的ICU患者中诊断阳性率显著更高(41次BAL中有26次)。这组ICU中性粒细胞减少患者中确诊的感染性肺炎病例数显著更高。在接受SCT的患者中,弥漫性浸润与BAL阴性结果具有统计学相关性。26例接受诊断性BAL的患者改变了治疗方案。发生了16例并发症(17%),仅2例需要插管。ICU的总体死亡率及机械通气的中性粒细胞减少患者的死亡率分别为71%和93%。在接受SCT的中性粒细胞减少患者中,未明确诊断的患者死亡率在统计学上更高。与BAL未改变治疗方案的患者相比,BAL改变治疗方案的患者生存概率并未增加。
对于入住ICU的中性粒细胞减少伴肺部浸润患者,即使BAL有助于这些重症患者的管理,也难以确定常规诊断性BAL的应用价值。我们ICU中性粒细胞减少患者群体中BAL的总体诊断阳性率为可接受的49%,在化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少的ICU患者中更高。然而,在ICU中,即使BAL并发症发生率低,其很少导致治疗改变,且与患者生存率改善无关。