Suppr超能文献

在猪急性呼吸窘迫综合征模型中,与单纯呼气末正压通气相比,生物可变通气可提高动脉氧合水平。

Biologically variable ventilation increases arterial oxygenation over that seen with positive end-expiratory pressure alone in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Mutch W A, Harms S, Lefevre G R, Graham M R, Girling L G, Kowalski S E

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Neuroanesthesia Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2457-64. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00045.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared biologically variable ventilation (BVV) (as previously described) (1) with conventional control mode ventilation (CV) in a model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) both at 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, prospective study.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Farm-raised 3- to 4-month-old swine.

INTERVENTIONS

Oleic acid (OA) was infused at 0.2 mL/kg/hr with FIO2 = 0.5 and 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure until PaO2 was < or =60 mm Hg; then all animals were placed on an additional 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure for the next 4 hrs. Animals were assigned randomly to continue CV (n = 9) or to have CV computer controlled to deliver BVV (variable respiratory rate and tidal volume; n = 8). Hemodynamic, expired gas, airway pressure, and volume data were obtained at baseline (before OA), immediately after OA, and then at 60-min intervals for 4 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At 4 hrs after OA injury, significantly higher PaO2 (213+/-17 vs. 123+/-47 mm Hg; mean+/-SD), lower shunt fraction (6%+/-1% vs. 18%+/-14%), and lower PaCO2 (50+/-8 vs. 65+/-11 mm Hg) were seen with BVV than with CV. Respiratory system compliance was greater by experiment completion with BVV (0.37+/-0.05 vs. 0.31+/-0.08 mL/cm H2O/kg). The improvements in oxygenation, CO2 elimination, and respiratory mechanics occurred without a significant increase in either mean airway pressure (14.3+/-0.9 vs. 14.9+/-1.1 cm H2O) or mean peak airway pressure (39.3+/-3.5 vs. 44.5+/-7.2 cm H2O) with BVV. The oxygen index increased five-fold with OA injury and decreased to significantly lower levels over time with BVV.

CONCLUSIONS

In this model of ARDS, BVV with 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure improved arterial oxygenation over and above that seen with CV with positive end-expiratory pressure alone. Proposed mechanisms for BVV efficacy are discussed.

摘要

目的

我们在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)模型中,于呼气末正压为10 cm H₂O时,将生物可变通气(BVV)(如前所述)与传统控制模式通气(CV)进行比较。

设计

随机、对照、前瞻性研究。

地点

大学研究实验室。

研究对象

农场饲养的3至4月龄猪。

干预措施

以0.2 mL/kg/小时的速度输注油酸(OA),吸入氧分数(FIO₂)= 0.5,呼气末正压为5 cm H₂O,直至动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)≤60 mmHg;然后在接下来的4小时内,所有动物呼气末正压增加5 cm H₂O。动物被随机分配继续接受CV(n = 9)或通过计算机控制CV以实现BVV(呼吸频率和潮气量可变;n = 8)。在基线(OA前)、OA后即刻以及随后4小时内每隔60分钟获取血流动力学、呼出气体、气道压力和容积数据。

测量指标及主要结果

在OA损伤后4小时,与CV相比,BVV组的PaO₂显著更高(213±17 vs. 123±47 mmHg;均值±标准差),分流分数更低(6%±1% vs. 18%±14%),PaCO₂更低(50±8 vs. 65±11 mmHg)。到实验结束时,BVV组的呼吸系统顺应性更高(0.37±0.05 vs. 0.31±0.08 mL/cm H₂O/kg)。在氧合、二氧化碳清除和呼吸力学方面的改善,并未伴随BVV组平均气道压力(14.3±0.9 vs. 14.9±1.1 cm H₂O)或平均气道峰压(39.3±3.5 vs. 44.5±7.2 cm H₂O)的显著增加。随着OA损伤,氧指数增加了五倍,随着时间推移,BVV使其降至显著更低水平。

结论

在该ARDS模型中,呼气末正压为10 cm H₂O时,BVV相比仅采用呼气末正压的CV能更好地改善动脉氧合。文中讨论了BVV疗效的可能机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验