Opartkiattikul N
Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30 Suppl 3:79-85.
A lot of attempts have been made to standardise both activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT). Only the standardization of PT has been successfully implemented while the standardization of APTT is still underway. The PT test is a common method for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy. Owing to the variable response of the thromboplastins and the different ways of reporting, PT results obtained from patients treated with oral anticoagulants have not been interchangeable between laboratories. In 1977, the World Health Organization (WHO) designed a batch of human brain thromboplastin as the first international reference preparation (IRP) for thromboplastin and a calibration system was proposed in 1982, based on the assumption that a linear relationship exists between the logarithm of the PT obtained with the IRP and test thromboplastins. This calibration model is used to standardize the reporting of the PT by converting the PT ratio observed with the local thromboplastin into an International Normalized Ratio (INR). The INR system is being adopted by an increasing number of hospitals in many countries. With the increasing use of the INR system, a number of problems have been identified with the INR system. The most serious one is that the ISI of a thromboplastin depends on the coagulometer used. Besides, a number of investigators have noted that the ISI value provided by the manufacturer for each new batch of thromboplastin reagent may be incorrect and the use of inappropriate control plasma can lead to erroneous INR calculations. Four solutions have been proposed to solve the problems of the INR system as follows: (a) the local system calibration with lyophilized plasma calibrants with assigned manual PT determined in terms of the relevant IRP for thromboplastin; (b) the use of a mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) obtained with the coagulometer to derive the prothrombin ratio: (c) PT standardization by means of the procedure using plasma calibrants: and (d) selection of sensitive thromboplastin with low ISI values. The INR system has been adopted in Thailand since 1984. There are 3 steps in the implementation as follows: (a) preparation of National Reference Thromboplastin; (b) selection of high sensitive thromboplastin; and (c) optimal therapeutic range for Thai patients. The anticoagulant effect of heparin is usually monitored by the APTT, a test that is sensitive to the inhibitory effects of heparin on thrombin, factor Xa. and factor IXa. However, the type of clot detection system, the contact activator; and the phospholipid composition of the reagent affect the APTT response. In 1995. ISTH/ICSH proposed a calibration model for APTT standardization. As the problem showed a great similarity to PT standardization, the same model of calibration was applied but no international reference preparation for the APTT is yet available. In 1998. van den Besselaar et al proposed a lyophilized APTT reagent comprising synthetic phospholipids and colloidal silica as a candidate IRP for the APTT.
人们已多次尝试对活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)和凝血酶原时间(PT)进行标准化。目前仅凝血酶原时间的标准化得以成功实施,而活化部分凝血活酶时间的标准化仍在进行中。凝血酶原时间检测是监测口服抗凝治疗的常用方法。由于凝血活酶的反应存在差异以及报告方式不同,接受口服抗凝治疗患者的凝血酶原时间检测结果在不同实验室之间不可互换。1977年,世界卫生组织(WHO)设计了一批人脑组织凝血活酶作为首批凝血活酶国际参考制剂(IRP),并于1982年提出了一个校准系统,其假设是用IRP获得的凝血酶原时间对数与检测用凝血活酶之间存在线性关系。该校准模型用于通过将使用当地凝血活酶观察到的凝血酶原时间比值转换为国际标准化比值(INR)来规范凝血酶原时间的报告。许多国家越来越多的医院采用了INR系统。随着INR系统使用的增加,已发现该系统存在一些问题。最严重的问题是凝血活酶的国际敏感度指数(ISI)取决于所使用的凝血仪。此外,一些研究人员指出,制造商为每一批新的凝血活酶试剂提供的ISI值可能不正确,使用不当的对照血浆会导致INR计算错误。针对INR系统的问题,已提出以下四种解决方案:(a)使用根据凝血活酶相关IRP确定的具有指定手工凝血酶原时间的冻干血浆校准物进行当地系统校准;(b)使用凝血仪获得的平均正常凝血酶原时间(MNPT)得出凝血酶原比值;(c)通过使用血浆校准物的程序进行凝血酶原时间标准化;(d)选择具有低ISI值的敏感凝血活酶。自1984年以来泰国采用了INR系统。实施过程有以下三个步骤:(a)制备国家参考凝血活酶;(b)选择高灵敏度凝血活酶;(c)确定泰国患者的最佳治疗范围。肝素的抗凝作用通常通过APTT监测,该检测对肝素对凝血酶、因子Xa和因子IXa的抑制作用敏感。然而,凝块检测系统的类型、接触激活剂以及试剂的磷脂组成会影响APTT反应。1995年,国际血栓与止血学会/国际血液学标准化委员会(ISTH/ICSH)提出了APTT标准化的校准模型。由于该问题与凝血酶原时间标准化极为相似,因此应用了相同的校准模型,但尚无APTT的国际参考制剂。1998年,范登贝塞拉尔等人提出了一种包含合成磷脂和胶体二氧化硅的冻干APTT试剂作为APTT的候选IRP。