Kagawa Kazuhiko
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo.
Rinsho Byori. 2002 Aug;50(8):779-85.
This review regarding prothrombin time and its standardization is described around some recent topics as the followings. 1. History of standardization for prothrombin time and revised WHO guideline for thromboplastin; A short history of standardization is summarized to understand a scheme of International Normalized Ratio (INR) based on International Sensitivity Index (ISI) that is calibrated by International Reference Preparation (IRP) for thromboplastin, and some key points in revised WHO guideline for thromboplastin and plasma used to control oral anticoagulant therapy are interpreted for research and practical use. 2. Point-of-care prothrombin time monitoring; A portable device to measure prothrombin time with whole blood sample, such as CoagChek (Roche), contributes to self-management by patients required long-term oral anticoagulation. Some investigators reported clinical agreement to use this monitoring system and improvement of patient's QOL and cost-effectiveness in overseas. 3. New types of thromboplastins; Two new types of thromboplastins have been available since the last year in Japan. One is a human plain thromboplastin, Simplastin HTF (Bioméreux) from extract of cultured human lung cancer cell, and another is IL test PT-Fibrinogen Recombinant (Iatron) from recombinant rabbit tissue factor relipidated in a synthetic phospholipid blend. For control of oral anticoagulation, good performance are expected in either thromboplastins because of their sufficient low ISI values. 4. INR methodology for other diseases; INR/ISI system is designed as a standardized methodology for control of oral anticoagulation. Prothrombin time, however is utilized as a global coagulation test for diagnosis or criteria of other disorders, such as congenital coagulation factor deficient, severe liver dysfunction and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Previous our study indicated that discrepancy of sensitivities to plasma absorbed multiple coagulation factors and plasma from patients under oral anticoagulation was revealed in rabbit brain thromboplastins, but not in human origins. Discrepancy of sensitivities observed in rabbit thromboplastins was emphasized in convert to INR values. These results suggested that the use of human thromboplastin of which ISI is close to 1.0 leads possibility for introducing INR methodology to evaluate PT of other disorders.
本关于凝血酶原时间及其标准化的综述围绕以下一些近期主题展开。1. 凝血酶原时间标准化的历史及世界卫生组织(WHO)对凝血活酶的修订指南;总结标准化的简短历史,以理解基于国际敏感指数(ISI)的国际标准化比值(INR)方案,该指数由凝血活酶的国际参考制剂(IRP)校准,并解读WHO对用于控制口服抗凝治疗的凝血活酶和血浆的修订指南中的一些关键点,以供研究和实际应用。2. 即时检验凝血酶原时间监测;一种用于用全血样本测量凝血酶原时间的便携式设备,如CoagChek(罗氏公司),有助于长期口服抗凝患者的自我管理。一些研究者报告称,在海外使用该监测系统具有临床一致性,且能改善患者的生活质量并具有成本效益。3. 新型凝血活酶;自去年以来,日本已有两种新型凝血活酶上市。一种是从培养的人肺癌细胞提取物中获得的人源性普通凝血活酶Simplastin HTF(生物梅里埃公司),另一种是在合成磷脂混合物中重新脂质化的重组兔组织因子制成的IL test PT - 纤维蛋白原重组剂(日本医工公司)。对于口服抗凝的控制,由于其足够低的ISI值,预计这两种凝血活酶都有良好表现。4. 其他疾病的INR方法;INR/ISI系统被设计为控制口服抗凝的标准化方法。然而,凝血酶原时间被用作诊断或其他疾病标准的全面凝血试验,如先天性凝血因子缺乏、严重肝功能障碍和弥散性血管内凝血。我们之前的研究表明,兔脑凝血活酶对吸收多种凝血因子的血浆和口服抗凝患者血浆的敏感性存在差异,但人源性凝血活酶不存在这种差异。在转换为INR值时,兔凝血活酶中观察到的敏感性差异更为突出。这些结果表明,使用ISI接近1.0的人凝血活酶有可能引入INR方法来评估其他疾病的凝血酶原时间。