Burgess J R, Nord B, David R, Greenaway T M, Parameswaran V, Larsson C, Shepherd J J, Teh B T
Departments of Diabetes and Endocrine Services; Clinical Chemistry, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000 Aug;53(2):205-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01032.x.
The majority of reports describing the natural history and prognosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) utilize phenotypic rather than molecular genetic criteria to establish a diagnosis of MEN 1.
We sought to determine the spectrum of endocrine abnormality amongst 152 members (64 gene carriers and 88 noncarriers) of a large MEN 1 family in whom a determination of MEN 1 status had previously been made by phenotype screening. The predictive utility of both clinical and molecular screening techniques are described.
A novel IVS2-3 (C-G) MEN1 mutation was identified in affected members of this family. Seven (10%) of 71 individuals satisfying clinical diagnostic criteria for MEN 1 were found to be genetically negative (excluded by mutation analysis and haplotyping) for MEN 1. These cases of MEN 1 phenocopy comprised four cases of primary hyperparathyroidism, two 'nonsecretory' pituitary adenoma and one case of coincident prolactinoma and hyperparathyroidism. Three of the patients with hyperparathyroidism had previously required parathyroidectomy and each had achieved normocalcaemia following parathyroid resection. Predictive genetic testing prospectively identified three children with the MEN 1 genotype. Serum calcium was normal at the time of their initial molecular genetic diagnosis. In each case hyperparathyroidism subsequently developed during adolescence.
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 phenocopy is an important differential diagnosis in patients exhibiting an multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 phenotype. This is a relevant consideration, particularly when the diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is made using sensitive, but nonspecific, criteria such as mild hyperparathyroidism, pituitary micoadenoma, and hyperprolactinaemia. Confirmatory genetic testing should be undertaken to confirm clinical diagnoses of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.
大多数描述1型多发性内分泌腺瘤病(MEN 1)自然病史和预后的报告采用表型而非分子遗传学标准来诊断MEN 1。
我们试图确定一个大型MEN 1家族的152名成员(64名基因携带者和88名非携带者)中内分泌异常的范围,该家族之前已通过表型筛查确定了MEN 1状态。描述了临床和分子筛查技术的预测效用。
在该家族的患病成员中鉴定出一种新的IVS2 - 3(C - G)MEN1突变。在71名符合MEN 1临床诊断标准的个体中,有7名(10%)被发现MEN 1基因检测为阴性(通过突变分析和单倍型分析排除)。这些MEN 1表型模拟病例包括4例原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进、2例“无分泌功能”垂体腺瘤和1例同时患有泌乳素瘤和甲状旁腺功能亢进的病例。3例甲状旁腺功能亢进患者之前需要进行甲状旁腺切除术,且在甲状旁腺切除术后均实现了血钙正常。预测性基因检测前瞻性地鉴定出3名患有MEN 1基因型的儿童。在他们最初的分子遗传学诊断时血清钙正常。在每种情况下,甲状旁腺功能亢进随后在青春期出现。
1型多发性内分泌腺瘤病表型模拟是表现出1型多发性内分泌腺瘤病表型的患者的重要鉴别诊断。这是一个相关的考虑因素,特别是当使用敏感但非特异性的标准(如轻度甲状旁腺功能亢进、垂体微腺瘤和高泌乳素血症)来诊断1型多发性内分泌腺瘤病时。应进行确诊性基因检测以确认1型多发性内分泌腺瘤病的临床诊断。