Koch H G, Müller M
Institut für Biochemie und Molekularbiologie, Universität Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
J Cell Biol. 2000 Aug 7;150(3):689-94. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.3.689.
Recent evidence suggests that in Escherichia coli, SecA/SecB and signal recognition particle (SRP) are constituents of two different pathways targeting secretory and inner membrane proteins to the SecYEG translocon of the plasma membrane. We now show that a secY mutation, which compromises a functional SecY-SecA interaction, does not impair the SRP-mediated integration of polytopic inner membrane proteins. Furthermore, under conditions in which the translocation of secretory proteins is strictly dependent on SecG for assisting SecA, the absence of SecG still allows polytopic membrane proteins to integrate at the wild-type level. These results indicate that SRP-dependent integration and SecA/SecB-mediated translocation do not only represent two independent protein delivery systems, but also remain mechanistically distinct processes even at the level of the membrane where they engage different domains of SecY and different components of the translocon. In addition, the experimental setup used here enabled us to demonstrate that SRP-dependent integration of a multispanning protein into membrane vesicles leads to a biologically active enzyme.
最近的证据表明,在大肠杆菌中,SecA/SecB和信号识别颗粒(SRP)是将分泌蛋白和内膜蛋白靶向质膜的SecYEG转运体的两条不同途径的组成部分。我们现在表明,一个损害SecY与SecA功能相互作用的secY突变,并不损害SRP介导的多跨膜内膜蛋白的整合。此外,在分泌蛋白的转运严格依赖SecG协助SecA的条件下,SecG的缺失仍然允许多跨膜蛋白以野生型水平进行整合。这些结果表明,SRP依赖的整合和SecA/SecB介导的转运不仅代表两个独立的蛋白质递送系统,而且即使在它们与SecY的不同结构域和转运体的不同组分相互作用的膜水平上,在机制上仍然是不同的过程。此外,这里使用的实验设置使我们能够证明,多跨膜蛋白依赖SRP整合到膜囊泡中会产生一种生物活性酶。