• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校环境中的音乐疗法评估:一项初步调查。

Music therapy assessment in school settings: a preliminary investigation.

作者信息

Wilson B L, Smith D S

机构信息

Western Michigan University, USA.

出版信息

J Music Ther. 2000 Summer;37(2):95-117. doi: 10.1093/jmt/37.2.95.

DOI:10.1093/jmt/37.2.95
PMID:10932124
Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken in response to music therapists working in school settings for information relating to the availability of music therapy assessments and the feasibility of standardizing an assessment instrument for music therapists to use in school settings. Five research questions were identified, and the music therapy literature was surveyed to compile responses to those questions. Three different online data bases (ERIC, PsycINFO, and Article 1st) were used, covering articles published between 1980 and 1997. Individual hand searches were done of the Arts in Psychotherapy, Journal of Music Therapy, Journal of Research in Music Education, Journal of the International Association of Music for the Handicapped, Music Therapy and Music Therapy Perspectives. The questions and responses were as follows: 1. Which music-based assessment tools are being used with children with disabilities? Little commonality in assessment tools being used by music therapists and researchers was discovered. Of the total 41 studies, 20 (49%) reported using a "named" or "titled" assessment tool, and in the remaining 51% of studies, the authors reported using an untitled, and usually experimenter-designed, original assessment tool. 2. Have certain assessments been used in more than one study? Very limited replication of existing assessments was found. Of the 16 "named" assessments, only 3 were found to be used in more than one research study. 3. Are the actual assessments published along with the articles describing their use? Only 3 of the 20 studies using named assessments were published along with the journal article. Of the remaining 21 studies using original, experimenter-designed assessment tools, only 6 (28%) had the assessment instrument published with the article. 4. What is the primary purpose for using the assessment? Six primary purposes emerged from the review of the literature: to compare with data obtained from other assessment measures or from other populations (39%), as a baseline or pretest measure (29%), to determine eligibility for services or the receipt of treatment (12%), to determine the psychometric properties of the assessment (7%), suitability of the instrument for the given population (7%), and the identification of musical preferences (5%). 5. What are the musical or nonmusic elements being assessed? Musical elements were: music perception (37%), musical aptitude (29%), musical preferences (12%), and attention to/enjoyment of music (2%). Nonmusical behaviors/responses were: self-expression (10%), motor responses (10%), behavioral responses (7%), cognitive development (2%), and acts of communication (2%). 6. What subject populations are being assessed? Subject populations were: children with developmental disabilities/mental retardation (44%), children with autism (10%), children with hearing impairments (17%), "psychiatric" clients or emotionally disturbed (22%), individuals described as "handicapped" (5%), individuals with physical disabilities (2%), and a student with a speech impairment (2%). Nondisabled individuals were also included in 12 of the aforementioned studies.

摘要

本次调查旨在回应在学校环境中工作的音乐治疗师,以获取有关音乐治疗评估的可用性以及为音乐治疗师在学校环境中使用而标准化评估工具的可行性的信息。确定了五个研究问题,并对音乐治疗文献进行了调查,以汇总对这些问题的回答。使用了三个不同的在线数据库(教育资源信息中心、心理学文摘数据库和第一期刊),涵盖1980年至1997年发表的文章。还对《心理治疗中的艺术》《音乐治疗杂志》《音乐教育研究杂志》《国际残疾人音乐协会杂志》《音乐治疗》和《音乐治疗视角》进行了单独人工检索。问题及回答如下:1. 哪些基于音乐的评估工具用于残疾儿童?发现音乐治疗师和研究人员使用的评估工具几乎没有共性。在总共41项研究中,20项(49%)报告使用了“命名”或“有标题”的评估工具,在其余51% 的研究中,作者报告使用的是无标题的、通常由实验者设计的原创评估工具。2. 某些评估是否在不止一项研究中被使用?发现现有评估的重复使用非常有限。在16项“命名”评估中,仅发现3项被用于不止一项研究。3. 实际评估是否与描述其使用情况的文章一起发表?在使用命名评估工具的20项研究中,只有3项与期刊文章一起发表。在其余21项使用原创的、由实验者设计的评估工具的研究中,只有6项(28%)将评估工具与文章一起发表。4. 使用评估的主要目的是什么?文献综述中出现了六个主要目的:与从其他评估措施或其他人群获得的数据进行比较(39%),作为基线或预测试措施(29%),确定服务资格或接受治疗情况(12%),确定评估的心理测量特性(7%),评估工具对特定人群的适用性(7%),以及识别音乐偏好(5%)。5. 正在评估的音乐或非音乐元素有哪些?音乐元素包括:音乐感知(37%)、音乐才能(29%)、音乐偏好(12%)以及对音乐的关注/喜爱(2%)。非音乐行为/反应包括:自我表达(10%)、运动反应(10%)、行为反应(7%)、认知发展(2%)以及交流行为(2%)。6. 正在评估哪些受试人群?受试人群包括:发育障碍/智力迟钝儿童(44%)、自闭症儿童(10%)、听力障碍儿童(17%)‘精神疾病’患者或情绪困扰者(22%)、被描述为‘残疾’的个体(5%)、身体残疾个体(2%)以及一名言语障碍学生(2%)上述研究中有12项也纳入了非残疾个体。

相似文献

1
Music therapy assessment in school settings: a preliminary investigation.学校环境中的音乐疗法评估:一项初步调查。
J Music Ther. 2000 Summer;37(2):95-117. doi: 10.1093/jmt/37.2.95.
2
The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.面向家庭的人工耳蜗植入儿童音乐训练:两年随访的言语和音乐感知结果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;73(7):1043-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 2.
3
Parents and Young Children with Disabilities: The Effects of a Home-Based Music Therapy Program on Parent-Child Interactions.家长和残疾儿童:基于家庭的音乐治疗计划对亲子互动的影响。
J Music Ther. 2016 Spring;53(1):27-54. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thv018. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
4
The effect of musical attention control training (MACT) on attention skills of adolescents with neurodevelopmental delays: a pilot study.音乐注意力控制训练(MACT)对神经发育迟缓青少年注意力技能的影响:一项初步研究。
J Music Ther. 2014 Winter;51(4):333-54. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thu030.
5
An analysis of music therapy program goals and outcomes for clients with diagnoses on the autism spectrum.对患有自闭症谱系诊断的客户的音乐治疗项目目标及成果的分析。
J Music Ther. 2005 Spring;42(1):2-19. doi: 10.1093/jmt/42.1.2.
6
Music Therapists' Perceptions of the Therapeutic Potentials Using Music When Working With Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Qualitative Analysis.音乐治疗师在与自闭症谱系儿童进行言语治疗时对音乐治疗潜力的看法:定性分析。
J Music Ther. 2020 Feb 25;57(1):66-90. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thz017.
7
Music therapy assessment for children with developmental disabilities: a survey study.
J Music Ther. 2004 Spring;41(1):28-54. doi: 10.1093/jmt/41.1.28.
8
The use of music therapy within the SCERTS model for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.在SCERTS模式中对自闭症谱系障碍儿童使用音乐疗法。
J Music Ther. 2007 Spring;44(1):2-22. doi: 10.1093/jmt/44.1.2.
9
Four decades of music therapy behavioral research designs: a content analysis of Journal of music therapy articles.四十年音乐治疗行为研究设计:对《音乐治疗杂志》文章的内容分析
J Music Ther. 2002 Spring;39(1):56-71. doi: 10.1093/jmt/39.1.56.
10
Test instruments used by Journal of Music Therapy authors from 1984-1997.《音乐治疗杂志》1984年至1997年作者使用的测试仪器。
J Music Ther. 2000 Summer;37(2):79-94. doi: 10.1093/jmt/37.2.79.

引用本文的文献

1
Group Music Intervention Using Percussion Instruments to Reduce Anxiety Among Elderly Male Veterans with Alzheimer Disease.使用打击乐器的团体音乐干预对老年男性阿尔茨海默病退伍军人焦虑的影响。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Feb 21;27:e928714. doi: 10.12659/MSM.928714.