Lilleyman J
St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, England.
Paediatr Drugs. 1999 Jul-Sep;1(3):197-209. doi: 10.2165/00128072-199901030-00004.
It is 50 years since the first effective drug for childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) was described. At that time the outlook for such children was certain death. Now patients have an odds-on chance of normal health and life expectancy. Although the greatest gains have been made in recent years, the classes of drug that have achieved this have all been available for over 20 years. It is their better deployment and the greater understanding of their pharmacology that have allowed both more effective protocols to be devised and long term adverse effects to be recognised and avoided. Supportive treatment has also improved in parallel. Three major problems remain: (i) how to recognise children in whom conventional therapy will fail; (ii) how to prevent failure; and (iii) how to treat it if it occurs. Therapy will fail in some children for pharmacological reasons--noncompliance or constitutional (genetic) drug resistance. For such children in vitro drug sensitivity testing and greater pharmacological vigilance may help by identifying those at risk and allowing intervention. In others, treatment will fail because of intrinsically resistant disease that either develops despite therapy or regrows from a minimal residue. Despite wider application of sophisticated immunological and genetic studies both at diagnosis or later, recognising poor-prognosis children prospectively is hampered by the lack of a biological classification system that is sufficiently sensitive and specific to categorise all patients reliably. In those where there is no doubt about high-risk status, treatment failure rates are still unacceptably high whatever therapy is given, and salvage therapy in any child who relapses is a continuing challenge.
自描述出第一种治疗儿童淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的有效药物至今已有50年。当时,这类儿童的前景是必死无疑。如今,患者有很大机会拥有正常的健康状况和预期寿命。尽管近年来取得了最大的进展,但实现这一目标的各类药物都已问世超过20年。正是它们更好的应用以及对其药理学的更深入理解,才使得既能设计出更有效的治疗方案,又能识别并避免长期不良反应。支持性治疗也同步得到了改善。仍存在三个主要问题:(i)如何识别传统疗法会失败的儿童;(ii)如何预防失败;(iii)如果失败发生,如何进行治疗。由于药理学原因——不依从或先天性(遗传)耐药,一些儿童的治疗会失败。对于这类儿童,体外药物敏感性测试和更高的药理学监测可能会有所帮助,通过识别有风险的儿童并进行干预。在其他儿童中,治疗失败是因为存在内在耐药性疾病,这种疾病要么在治疗过程中出现,要么从微小残留病灶复发。尽管在诊断时或之后更广泛地应用了复杂的免疫学和遗传学研究,但由于缺乏一个足够敏感和特异、能可靠地对所有患者进行分类的生物学分类系统,前瞻性地识别预后不良的儿童受到了阻碍。在那些毫无疑问属于高危状态的儿童中,无论给予何种治疗,治疗失败率仍然高得令人无法接受,而且任何复发儿童的挽救治疗都是持续的挑战。