Orzalesi N, Rossetti L, Invernizzi T, Bottoli A, Autelitano A
Eye Clinic, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Italy.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Aug;41(9):2566-73.
To compare the around-the-clock intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction induced by timolol 0.5%, latanoprost 0.005%, and dorzolamide in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).
In this crossover trial, 20 patients with POAG (n = 10) or OHT (n = 10) were treated with timolol, latanoprost, and dorzolamide for 1 month. The treatment sequence was randomized. All patients underwent measurements for four 24-hour tonometric curves: at baseline and after each 1-month period of treatment. The patients were admitted to the hospital, and IOP was measured by two well-trained evaluators masked to treatment assignment. Measurements were taken at 3, 6, and 9 AM and noon and at 3, 6, and 9 PM and midnight by handheld electronic tonometer (TonoPen XL; Bio-Rad, Glendale, CA) with the patient supine and sitting, and a Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag-Streit, Bern, Switzerland) with the patient sitting at the slit lamp. Systemic blood pressure was recorded at the same times. The between-group differences were tested for significance by means of parametric analysis of variance. The circadian IOP curve of a small group of untreated healthy young subjects was also recorded using the same procedures. To compare the circadian IOP rhythms in the POAG-OHT and control groups, the acrophases for each subject were calculated.
When Goldmann sitting values were considered, all the drugs significantly reduced IOP in comparison with baseline at all times, except for timolol at 3 AM. Latanoprost was more effective in lowering IOP than timolol at 3, 6, and 9 AM (P = 0.03), noon (P = 0.01), 9 PM, and midnight (P = 0.05) and was more effective than dorzolamide at 9 AM, noon (P = 0.03), and 3 and 6 PM (P = 0.04). Timolol was more effective than dorzolamide at 3 PM (P = 0.05), whereas dorzolamide performed better than timolol at midnight and 3 AM (P = 0.05). An ancillary finding of this study was that in the group of healthy subjects, the pattern of IOP curve was different that in patients with eye disease.
Latanoprost seemed to lead to a fairly uniform circadian reduction in IOP, whereas timolol seemed to be less effective during the nighttime hours. Dorzolamide was less effective than latanoprost but led to a significant reduction in nocturnal IOP. The reason for the difference in the pattern of the IOP curve of healthy subjects is currently unknown and deserves further investigation.
比较0.5%噻吗洛尔、0.005%拉坦前列素和多佐胺对原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)或高眼压症(OHT)患者眼压的昼夜降低效果。
在这项交叉试验中,20例POAG患者(n = 10)或OHT患者(n = 10)分别接受噻吗洛尔、拉坦前列素和多佐胺治疗1个月。治疗顺序随机。所有患者在基线期及每个1个月治疗期后进行4次24小时眼压测量曲线测量。患者入院后,由两名对治疗分配不知情的训练有素的评估人员测量眼压。采用手持式电子眼压计(TonoPen XL;Bio-Rad,加利福尼亚州格伦代尔)在患者仰卧位和坐位时于凌晨3点、6点、9点、中午、下午3点、6点、9点和午夜进行测量,同时采用戈德曼压平眼压计(Haag-Streit,瑞士伯尔尼)在裂隙灯下患者坐位时进行测量。同时记录全身血压。通过参数方差分析检验组间差异的显著性。还采用相同程序记录一小群未经治疗的健康年轻受试者的昼夜眼压曲线。为比较POAG - OHT组和对照组的昼夜眼压节律,计算每个受试者的峰值相位。
考虑戈德曼坐位眼压值时,与基线相比,所有药物在各个时间点均显著降低眼压,但凌晨3点时的噻吗洛尔除外。拉坦前列素在凌晨3点、6点、9点(P = 0.03)、中午(P = 0.01)、晚上9点和午夜(P = 0.05)降低眼压的效果比噻吗洛尔更好,在上午9点、中午(P = 0.03)、下午3点和6点(P = 0.04)比多佐胺更有效。噻吗洛尔在下午3点(P = 0.05)比多佐胺更有效,而多佐胺在午夜和凌晨3点(P = 0.05)比噻吗洛尔表现更好。本研究的一个附带发现是,健康受试者组的眼压曲线模式与眼病患者不同。
拉坦前列素似乎能使眼压在昼夜期间得到较为均匀的降低,而噻吗洛尔在夜间似乎效果较差。多佐胺比拉坦前列素效果差,但能显著降低夜间眼压。健康受试者眼压曲线模式存在差异的原因目前尚不清楚,值得进一步研究。