• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农场与农业伤害分类代码及随访问卷评估

Evaluation of the Farm and Agricultural Injury Classification Code and follow-up questionnaire.

作者信息

Yoder A M, Murphy D J

机构信息

Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Purdue University, USA.

出版信息

J Agric Saf Health. 2000 Feb;6(1):71-80. doi: 10.13031/2013.2913.

DOI:10.13031/2013.2913
PMID:10938754
Abstract

The Farm and Agricultural Injury Classification (FAIC) code was developed specifically to identify and classify all agricultural injuries of interest to agricultural safety and health professionals. The FAIC code overcomes fundamental problems of classifying agricultural-related injuries by grouping incidents into categories describing actual exposures encountered on farms and in agricultural work. The successful application of the FAIC code depends largely on a researcher's ability to obtain appropriate information to correctly use the code. The purpose of this research project was to: (1) compare data obtained through a newly developed FAIC follow-up questionnaire (FQ) with data from the Penn State Agricultural Injury Database (AID); and (2) test FAIC Code utility, reliability, and construct validity with agricultural safety and health professionals. The FQ improved classification of 57% of cases in the Penn State AID. A majority of agricultural health and safety professionals understood and used the FAIC coding system, without training, to code an average of 75% of the test cases the same as the researcher. A large majority of the professionals that participated in this study judged the FAIC code and the accompanying materials to be very useful.

摘要

农场与农业伤害分类(FAIC)代码是专门为识别和分类农业安全与健康专业人员所关注的所有农业伤害而制定的。FAIC代码通过将事故分组到描述农场和农业工作中实际接触情况的类别中,克服了对与农业相关伤害进行分类的基本问题。FAIC代码的成功应用在很大程度上取决于研究人员获取适当信息以正确使用该代码的能力。本研究项目的目的是:(1)将通过新开发的FAIC后续调查问卷(FQ)获得的数据与宾夕法尼亚州立大学农业伤害数据库(AID)的数据进行比较;(2)与农业安全与健康专业人员一起测试FAIC代码的实用性、可靠性和结构效度。FQ改进了宾夕法尼亚州立大学AID中57%病例的分类。大多数农业健康与安全专业人员在未经培训的情况下理解并使用FAIC编码系统,对平均75%的测试病例编码方式与研究人员相同。参与本研究的绝大多数专业人员认为FAIC代码及相关材料非常有用。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Farm and Agricultural Injury Classification Code and follow-up questionnaire.农场与农业伤害分类代码及随访问卷评估
J Agric Saf Health. 2000 Feb;6(1):71-80. doi: 10.13031/2013.2913.
2
A proposed classification code for farm and agricultural injuries.一个关于农场和农业伤害的拟议分类代码。
Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):736-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.736.
3
Coding agricultural injury: Factors affecting coder agreement.编码农业伤害:影响编码员一致性的因素。
J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Using multiple coding schemes for classification and coding of agricultural injury.使用多种编码方案对农业伤害进行分类和编码。
Am J Ind Med. 2019 Feb;62(2):87-98. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22932. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
Agricultural Youth Injuries: A Review of 2015-2017 Cases from U.S. News Media Reports.农业青少年伤害:对 2015-2017 年美国新闻媒体报道案例的回顾。
J Agromedicine. 2019 Jul;24(3):298-308. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1605955. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
A Multi-Year Analysis of Fatal Farm and Agricultural Injuries in Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州致命农场和农业伤害的多年分析
J Agric Saf Health. 2015 Oct;21(4):281-98. doi: 10.13031/jash.21.11166.
7
On-farm safety program.农场安全计划。
J Agromedicine. 2008;13(3):139-48. doi: 10.1080/10599240802371672.
8
A Descriptive Study of Farm-Related Injuries Presenting to Emergency Departments in North Carolina: 2008-2012.北卡罗来纳州急诊科收治的与农场相关损伤的描述性研究:2008 - 2012年
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(4):398-408. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1074972.
9
Agricultural youth injuries: An updated review of cases from U.S. news media reports, 2016-2021.农业青少年伤害:2016-2021 年美国新闻媒体报道案例的最新综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;10:1045858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045858. eCollection 2022.
10
Building community capacity for agricultural injury prevention in a Navajo community.在纳瓦霍族社区建立农业伤害预防的社区能力。
J Agric Saf Health. 2009 Jan;15(1):19-35. doi: 10.13031/2013.25413.