Fan K, Lee K L, Chiu C S, Lee J W, He G W, Cheung D, Sun M P, Lau C P
Cardiac Medical Unit, Grantham Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Circulation. 2000 Aug 15;102(7):755-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.7.755.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and results in prolonged hospitalization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of biatrial pacing in preventing post-CABG AF compared with single-site atrial pacing.
A total of 132 patients who had no history of AF and who underwent CABG were randomized to 1 of the following 4 groups: biatrial pacing (BiA), left atrial pacing (LA), right atrial pacing (RA), or no pacing (control) in postoperative period. Overdrive atrial pacing was performed for 5 days. The incidence of AF was significantly reduced in the BiA group (12.5%) compared with the other 3 groups (LA, 36.4%; RA, 33.3%; control, 41. 9%; P<0.05). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the BiA group. At baseline, the mean P-wave duration (P(dur)) and dispersion (P(dis)) were not prolonged. BiA pacing resulted in the most significant percentage of reduction in P(dis) when compared with the LA or RA groups (BiA, 42+/-8%; LA, 13+/-6%; RA, 10+/-9%; P<0.05 for BiA versus LA or RA). No significant differences existed in mean P(dur) and P(dis) between patients who developed AF and those who remained in sinus rhythm at baseline. However, only those patients who remained in sinus rhythm had a significant reduction in mean P(dur) and P(dis) after pacing therapy.
Biatrial overdrive pacing is more effective in preventing post-CABG AF than single-site atrial pacing; this therapy also results in a shortened hospital stay. The overall reduction in atrial activation time with BiA pacing was reflected in the reduction in P(dis).
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后房颤(AF)很常见,会导致住院时间延长。本研究的目的是评估双心房起搏与单部位心房起搏相比预防CABG术后房颤的疗效。
总共132例无房颤病史且接受CABG的患者在术后随机分为以下4组之一:双心房起搏(BiA)组、左心房起搏(LA)组、右心房起搏(RA)组或无起搏(对照组)。进行5天的超速心房起搏。与其他3组相比,BiA组的房颤发生率显著降低(12.5%,而LA组为36.4%;RA组为33.3%;对照组为41.9%;P<0.05)。BiA组的平均住院时间显著缩短。基线时,平均P波时限(P(dur))和离散度(P(dis))未延长。与LA或RA组相比,BiA起搏导致P(dis)降低的百分比最为显著(BiA组为42±8%;LA组为13±6%;RA组为10±9%;BiA组与LA或RA组相比,P<0.05)。在基线时发生房颤的患者与维持窦性心律的患者之间,平均P(dur)和P(dis)无显著差异。然而,只有维持窦性心律的患者在起搏治疗后平均P(dur)和P(dis)有显著降低。
双心房超速起搏在预防CABG术后房颤方面比单部位心房起搏更有效;这种治疗还可缩短住院时间。BiA起搏导致心房激动时间总体减少,这反映在P(dis)的降低上。