• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The importance of achieving additional drug benefits at a reasonable cost. A review of the fluoxetine years.

作者信息

Freemantle N, Mason J

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, England.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Apr;17(4):319-24. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017040-00001.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-200017040-00001
PMID:10947486
Abstract

Fluoxetine continues to be remarkably successful; greater volumes of this drug are sold than for any other antidepressant in the world. Prozac has also become a household name. In this article we examine the circumstances that surround this success, and the evidence base that supports it. Rather than being a major step forward in the treatment for depression, the evidence for fluoxetine and for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in general suggest at best a modest improvement in tolerability, with no evidence of improved efficacy. We note that the road to success was not problem free for fluoxetine, and highlight the response of the sponsor in the development of subsequent drugs for CNS disorders.

摘要

相似文献

1
The importance of achieving additional drug benefits at a reasonable cost. A review of the fluoxetine years.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Apr;17(4):319-24. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017040-00001.
2
Course and cost of treatment for depression with fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林治疗抑郁症的疗程及费用
Am J Manag Care. 1999 May;5(5):597-606.
3
Fluoxetine tenth anniversary update: the progress continues.氟西汀十周年更新:进展仍在继续。
Clin Ther. 1997 Sep-Oct;19(5):1135-250. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80066-5.
4
A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.急性重度抑郁症(MDD)的多国药物经济学评估:文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)的成本效益比较
Value Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;4(1):16-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001016.x.
5
A cost-effective approach to the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.退伍军人事务医疗中心使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的一种经济有效的方法。
Am J Manag Care. 1997 Jan;3(1):125-9.
6
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型抗抑郁药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub2.
7
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型的抑郁症药物治疗对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3.
8
Results of a retrospective claims database analysis of differences in antidepressant treatment persistence associated with escitalopram and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the United States.美国一项关于艾司西酞普兰与其他选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在抗抑郁治疗持续性差异的回顾性索赔数据库分析结果。
Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):644-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.012.
9
Health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of treating depression in people with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: a model-based analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区感染艾滋病毒者抑郁症治疗的健康结果与成本效益:基于模型的分析
AIDS Care. 2021 Apr;33(4):441-447. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1719966. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
10
Long-term costs of treatment for depression: impact of drug selection and guideline adherence.抑郁症治疗的长期成本:药物选择和指南依从性的影响。
Value Health. 2001 Jul-Aug;4(4):295-307. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.44084.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型的抑郁症药物治疗对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3.
2
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型抗抑郁药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub2.
3
Value for money of changing healthcare services? Economic evaluation of quality improvement.改变医疗服务的性价比?质量改进的经济评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-what makes a NSAID good value for money?
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Mar;39(3):232-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.232.
2
North of England evidence-based guideline development project: summary version of guidelines for the choice of antidepressants for depression in primary care. North of England Anti-depressant Guideline Development Group.英格兰北部循证指南制定项目:初级医疗中抑郁症抗抑郁药选择指南概要版本。英格兰北部抗抑郁药指南制定小组。
Fam Pract. 1999 Apr;16(2):103-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.2.103.
3
Does the UK National Health Service need a fourth hurdle for pharmaceutical reimbursement to encourage the more efficient prescribing of pharmaceuticals?英国国家医疗服务体系是否需要在药品报销方面设置第四道门槛,以鼓励更高效地开具药品处方?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):366-71. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.366.
Health Policy. 1999 Mar;46(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00060-8.
4
Are decisions taken by health care professionals rational? A non systematic review of experimental and quasi experimental literature.
Health Policy. 1996 Nov;38(2):71-81. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00837-8.
5
North of England evidence based guidelines development project: guideline for the primary care management of dementia.英格兰北部循证指南制定项目:痴呆症初级护理管理指南
BMJ. 1998 Sep 19;317(7161):802-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7161.802.
6
North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of developing guidelines for efficient drug use in primary care.英格兰北部循证指南制定项目:制定基层医疗中高效用药指南的方法
BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1232-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1232.
7
Pharmacological profile of antidepressants and related compounds at human monoamine transporters.抗抑郁药及相关化合物在人单胺转运体上的药理学特性。
Eur J Pharmacol. 1997 Dec 11;340(2-3):249-58. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(97)01393-9.
8
Should clinical trials with concurrent economic analyses be blinded?
JAMA. 1997 Jan 1;277(1):63-4.
9
Prevalence, aetiology and management of heart failure in general practice.全科医疗中心力衰竭的患病率、病因及管理
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):77-9.
10
Initial antidepressant choice in primary care. Effectiveness and cost of fluoxetine vs tricyclic antidepressants.初级保健中初始抗抑郁药物的选择。氟西汀与三环类抗抑郁药的疗效及成本比较
JAMA. 1996 Jun 26;275(24):1897-902.