Suppr超能文献

将研究应用于医疗保健政策与实践:医学与管理视角下的有效性及研究的作用

Applying research to health care policy and practice: medical and managerial views on effectiveness and the role of research.

作者信息

Rosen R

机构信息

King's Fund, London, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Apr;5(2):103-8. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500208.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study explores the way in which doctors and managers think about the effectiveness of health care interventions and how this shapes the evidence they use to support decision-making.

METHODS

Case studies of the introduction of three new medical technologies in nine National Health Service (NHS) hospitals and health authorities.

RESULTS

Effectiveness research provides essential evidence on clinical and cost-effectiveness and is used primarily by clinicians and public health doctors for this purpose. However, research fails to provide the 'evidence' required by managerial decision-makers, whose objectives relate as much to the effect of a technology on organisational performance as on patient health and well-being. The evidence used to inform technology adoption decisions reflects the professional role and objectives of different decision-makers.

CONCLUSIONS

The assumed relationship between 'research' and 'evidence' for the purpose of promoting effective health care does not take account of the wide range of objectives pursued by different health care decision-makers and the varied sources of 'evidence' they use to support their decisions.

摘要

目标

本研究探讨医生和管理人员思考医疗保健干预措施有效性的方式,以及这如何塑造他们用于支持决策的证据。

方法

对九家国民保健服务(NHS)医院和卫生当局引入三种新医疗技术的案例进行研究。

结果

有效性研究提供了关于临床和成本效益的重要证据,临床医生和公共卫生医生主要为此目的使用这些证据。然而,研究未能提供管理决策者所需的“证据”,他们的目标与技术对组织绩效的影响以及对患者健康和福祉的影响同样相关。用于为技术采用决策提供信息的证据反映了不同决策者的专业角色和目标。

结论

为促进有效的医疗保健,“研究”与“证据”之间假定的关系没有考虑到不同医疗保健决策者追求的广泛目标以及他们用于支持决策的各种“证据”来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验