Suppr超能文献

心脏手术后护士为患者拔管时的决策过程:一项人种志研究。

The decision-making processes of nurses when extubating patients following cardiac surgery: an ethnographic study.

作者信息

Hancock Helen C, Easen Patrick R

机构信息

School of Health, Community and Education Studies, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus East, H013, Benton, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7XA, UK.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Aug;43(6):693-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The movement towards research and evidence-based practice in health care demands that the best available evidence is applied to practice. At the same time, changes to role boundaries mean that nurses are assuming increased responsibility, especially in relation to decision making. While increasing, there has been limited consideration about the application of best evidence and decision making by nurses in the context of their clinical work.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore the realities of research and evidence-based practice through an examination of the decision making of nurses when extubating patients following cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

The tradition of qualitative research and, more specifically, ethnography were used for the study.

SETTING

Data were gathered over an 18-month period during 1998 and 1999 within a Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit (CICU).

PARTICIPANTS

The sample comprised 43 nursing, 16 medical and two managerial staff. A purposive sample of five nurses, a cardiac surgeon, intensivist, CICU manager and Deputy Divisional Manager were included in interviews.

METHODS

All staff were included in participant observation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of nurses during the 6th and 14th months and with a purposive sample of other staff during the 16th month. Data were analysed using progressive focusing, data source triangulation and sensitising concepts to identify themes and categories.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that, despite the use of an unwritten physiologically based protocol for weaning and extubation, factors other than best evidence were significant in nurses' decision making. A range of personal, cultural and contextual factors including relationships, hierarchy, power, leadership, education, experience and responsibility influenced their decision making.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed, often disregarded, cultural, contextual and personal characteristics which combined to form a complex process of decision making. Providing new insight into research and evidence-based practice, the findings have implications for policy makers, educators, managers and clinicians and for the continued professional development of nursing.

摘要

背景

医疗保健领域向研究和循证实践的转变要求将最佳可得证据应用于实践。与此同时,角色界限的变化意味着护士承担的责任越来越大,尤其是在决策方面。尽管责任在增加,但对于护士在临床工作中应用最佳证据和决策的考虑却很有限。

目的

本研究旨在通过考察心脏手术后患者拔管时护士的决策情况,探索研究和循证实践的实际情况。

设计

本研究采用定性研究传统,更具体地说是人种志研究方法。

背景

1998年至1999年期间,在心胸重症监护病房(CICU)进行了为期18个月的数据收集。

参与者

样本包括43名护理人员、16名医疗人员和2名管理人员。访谈对象包括5名护士、1名心脏外科医生、重症监护专家、CICU经理和部门副经理的目的抽样。

方法

所有工作人员都参与了参与观察。在第6个月和第14个月对护士进行了目的抽样的半结构化访谈,在第16个月对其他工作人员进行了目的抽样的半结构化访谈。使用逐步聚焦、数据源三角验证和敏感概念对数据进行分析,以识别主题和类别。

结果

研究结果表明,尽管使用了基于生理学的不成文撤机和拔管方案,但在护士的决策中,除最佳证据外的其他因素也很重要。一系列个人、文化和背景因素,包括人际关系、等级制度、权力、领导力、教育、经验和责任,影响了他们的决策。

结论

本研究揭示了常常被忽视的文化、背景和个人特征,这些特征共同构成了一个复杂的决策过程。这些发现为研究和循证实践提供了新的见解,对政策制定者、教育工作者、管理人员和临床医生以及护理专业的持续发展都有启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验