Suppr超能文献

探索对死亡凸显反应的个体差异:依恋风格是否调节恐惧管理机制?

Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms?

作者信息

Mikulincer M, Florian V

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Aug;79(2):260-73. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.2.260.

Abstract

Five studies examined the contribution of attachment style to mortality salience effects. In Study 1, mortality salience led to more severe judgments of transgressions only among anxious-ambivalent and avoidant persons but not among secure persons. In addition, whereas anxious-ambivalent persons showed immediate and delayed increases in severity judgments, avoidant persons showed this response only after a delay period. In Study 2, anxious-ambivalent persons showed immediate and delayed increases in death-thought accessibility after death reminders. Avoidant and secure persons showed this effect only after a delay period. Study 3 revealed that worldview defense in response to mortality salience reduced death-thought accessibility only among avoidant persons. Studies 4-5 revealed that mortality salience led to an increase in the sense of symbolic immortality as well as in the desire of intimacy only among secure persons, but not among avoidant and anxious-ambivalent persons.

摘要

五项研究考察了依恋风格对死亡凸显效应的影响。在研究1中,死亡凸显仅导致焦虑矛盾型和回避型个体对违规行为的判断更为严厉,而安全型个体则不然。此外,焦虑矛盾型个体的严厉判断在即时和延迟情况下均有所增加,而回避型个体仅在延迟一段时间后才出现这种反应。在研究2中,死亡提醒后,焦虑矛盾型个体的死亡念头通达性在即时和延迟情况下均有所增加。回避型和安全型个体仅在延迟一段时间后才出现这种效应。研究3表明,面对死亡凸显时的世界观防御仅在回避型个体中降低了死亡念头通达性。研究4至5表明,死亡凸显仅导致安全型个体的象征性不朽感以及亲密渴望增加,而回避型和焦虑矛盾型个体则不然。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验