Pu Q Q, Bezwoda W R
Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital, Manchester, U.K.
Anticancer Res. 2000 Jul-Aug;20(4):2569-78.
Previous studies have demonstrated alkylating (melphalan) resistance in the B-CLL derived WSU-CLL cell line as compared to WIL2 B lymphocytic cells. Nuclear extracts from WSU-CLL cells demonstrate a highly significant increase in DNA topoisomerase II activity as compared to WIL2 cells. Western blot analysis showed the level of topoisomerase II proteins expressed in WSU-CLL cells to be increased as compared to WIL2 cells. WSU-CLL cells were 5.24-fold more sensitive than WIL2 cells to the cytotoxic effect of the topoisomerase II inhibitor doxorubicin. No difference in topoisomerase I activity or of the level of topoisomerase I protein expression was observed comparing the two cell lines. The sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin, did not differ in WSU-CLL and WIL2 cell lines. Pre-incubation with doxorubicin significantly increased melphalan induced interstrand-DNA-crosslink formation and cytotoxicity in WSU-CLL cells as compared to WIL2 cells. The affinity of topoisomerase II for WSU-CLL UV-irradiated-crosslinked DNA was increased 2.84-fold as compared to that of WSU-CLL native DNA. The affinity of topoisomerase II for both UV-irradiated (crosslinked) and for native DNA was significantly decreased after doxorubicin-pretreatment. Measurement of DNA polymerase beta and DNA polymerase beta revealed significant elevations in DNA polymerase beta (58.82 +/- 3.67 units/mg protein in WSU-CLL cells, as compared to 27.82 +/- 4.39 units/mg protein in WIL 2 cells; p < 0.01) but not DNA polymerase beta (0.82 +/- 0.11 units/mg protein in WSU-CLL cells, compared to 0.74 +/- 0.09 units/mg protein in WIL2, p > 0.05). However, exposure to aphidicolin (an inhibitor of DNA polymerase a) failed to increase melphalan induced cytotoxicity suggesting that although DNA polymerase a activity was increased in WSU-CLL cells the mechanisms of resistance does not involve this specific DNA repair pathway. Elevated topoisomerase II activity and the increased affinity of topoisomerase II for crosslinked DNA in melphalan resistant cells appears to be the major factor responsible for alkylator resistance by changing DNA topology and thereby facilitating DNA repair.
先前的研究表明,与WIL2 B淋巴细胞相比,源自B-CLL的WSU-CLL细胞系对烷化剂(美法仑)具有抗性。与WIL2细胞相比,WSU-CLL细胞的核提取物显示DNA拓扑异构酶II活性显著增加。蛋白质印迹分析表明,与WIL2细胞相比,WSU-CLL细胞中表达的拓扑异构酶II蛋白水平有所增加。WSU-CLL细胞对拓扑异构酶II抑制剂阿霉素的细胞毒性作用的敏感性比WIL2细胞高5.24倍。比较这两种细胞系,未观察到拓扑异构酶I活性或拓扑异构酶I蛋白表达水平的差异。WSU-CLL和WIL2细胞系对拓扑异构酶I抑制剂喜树碱的细胞毒性作用的敏感性没有差异。与WIL2细胞相比,用阿霉素预孵育显著增加了美法仑诱导的WSU-CLL细胞中的链间DNA交联形成和细胞毒性。与WSU-CLL天然DNA相比,拓扑异构酶II对WSU-CLL紫外线照射交联DNA的亲和力增加了2.84倍。阿霉素预处理后,拓扑异构酶II对紫外线照射(交联)DNA和天然DNA的亲和力均显著降低。DNA聚合酶β和DNA聚合酶β的测量显示,DNA聚合酶β显著升高(WSU-CLL细胞中为58.82±3.67单位/毫克蛋白,而WIL 2细胞中为27.82±4.39单位/毫克蛋白;p<0.01),但DNA聚合酶β没有升高(WSU-CLL细胞中为0.82±0.11单位/毫克蛋白,而WIL2细胞中为0.74±0.09单位/毫克蛋白,p>0.05)。然而,暴露于阿非科林(一种DNA聚合酶α抑制剂)未能增加美法仑诱导的细胞毒性这表明,尽管WSU-CLL细胞中DNA聚合酶α活性增加,但抗性机制并不涉及这种特定的DNA修复途径。美法仑抗性细胞中拓扑异构酶II活性升高以及拓扑异构酶II对交联DNA的亲和力增加似乎是通过改变DNA拓扑结构从而促进DNA修复导致烷化剂抗性的主要因素。