Martan A, Masata J, Halaska M, Otcenásek M
Gynek.-porod. klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha.
Ceska Gynekol. 2000 May;65(3):152-6.
The aim of our study was to analyze whether transabdominal and introital ultrasonography can accurately identify paravaginal defect associated with GSI (Genuine stress urinary incontinence) and to determine the changes after paravaginal defect repair.
Prospective randomised clinical study.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sixteen women with GSI, who had previously not undergone anti-incontinence surgery were involved. Their average age was 52 years, average weight 71 kg and average parity 2.0. Within vaginal examination our attention was focussed on the diminution of sulsus superioris vaginae during Valsalva maneuver. The bladder of a patient in supine position was filled with 300 ml of sterile saline. Than a 5 MHz curved array probe was used to assess the bladder neck mobility from the perineal approach, and the same probe was used from the abdominal approach to determine paravaginal defect and subsequently a vaginal probe from introital approach was used for the rest of the examination. After Burch colposuspension and paravaginal defect repair US scanning was performed 6 till 8 days and 5 or 6 weeks after operation.
We found significant differences in bladder neck position and mobility before and after the operation. In women with symptoms of GSI we found from abdominal approach unilateral or bilateral paravaginal defect in fifteen women. Unilateral defect was found on the right side six times and on the left side only once. In eight women the defect was bilateral. The introital approach obtained similar results, only in two patients with bilateral defect the examination concluded unilateral right defect. After the operation we did not find PVD in patients after paravaginal defect repair. We obtained worse results from vaginal examination, where preoperatively PVD was correctly determined (sensitivity) only in 82.6%.
From our preliminary results we can suggest performing US scanning to conform paravaginal defect before anti-incontinence surgery and possibly adding to the Burch colposuspension paravaginal defect repair to correct cystourethrocele.
我们研究的目的是分析经腹超声和经阴道超声能否准确识别与真性压力性尿失禁(GSI)相关的阴道旁缺陷,并确定阴道旁缺陷修复后的变化。
前瞻性随机临床研究。
捷克共和国布拉格查理大学妇产科。
纳入16例未曾接受过抗尿失禁手术的GSI女性。她们的平均年龄为52岁,平均体重71kg,平均产次为2.0。在阴道检查过程中,我们将注意力集中在瓦尔萨尔瓦动作期间阴道上沟的缩小情况。患者仰卧位时,膀胱内注入300ml无菌生理盐水。然后使用5MHz的弯曲阵列探头从会阴途径评估膀胱颈活动度,从腹部途径使用相同探头确定阴道旁缺陷,随后从阴道途径使用阴道探头进行其余检查。在进行Burch阴道悬吊术和阴道旁缺陷修复术后6至8天以及术后5或6周进行超声扫描。
我们发现手术前后膀胱颈位置和活动度存在显著差异。在有GSI症状的女性中,通过腹部途径我们在15名女性中发现了单侧或双侧阴道旁缺陷。右侧单侧缺陷发现6次,左侧仅发现1次。8名女性存在双侧缺陷。经阴道途径获得了类似结果,仅在2例双侧缺陷患者中检查结果为单侧右侧缺陷。阴道旁缺陷修复术后,我们在患者中未发现阴道旁缺陷(PVD)。我们从阴道检查中得到的结果较差,术前PVD的正确判定(敏感性)仅为82.6%。
根据我们的初步结果,我们建议在抗尿失禁手术前进行超声扫描以确认阴道旁缺陷,并可能在Burch阴道悬吊术的基础上增加阴道旁缺陷修复以纠正膀胱尿道膨出。