Wang Y P, Shih R L, Huang C L, Huang H H, Tsai S K
Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Republic of China.
Clin Auton Res. 2000 Jun;10(3):117-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02278015.
Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, high-frequency gain, (0.15-0.35 Hz), and mid-frequency gain (0.07-0.14 Hz) are noninvasive measures of cardiac baroreflex function derived by spontaneous sequence and cross-spectral analysis. To demonstrate the difference between these baroreflex estimates, 14 patients received etomidate (0.3 mg/kg bolus and 0.9 mg/kg/h infusion), lidocaine (60 mg), and vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) by intravenous injection. The authors found that spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity and high-frequency gain were decreased (p <0.05) after etomidate anesthesia, whereas mid-frequency gain was maintained. Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, high-frequency gain, and mid-frequency gain, although compared simultaneously, did not change in a parallel manner. In another 5 patients, who received normal saline only, measures were unchanged. The authors conclude that spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity, high-frequency gain, and mid-frequency gain are not interchangeable. Experimental results on baroreflex control depend on the parameter selected.
自发性压力反射敏感性、高频增益(0.15 - 0.35赫兹)和中频增益(0.07 - 0.14赫兹)是通过自发性序列和交叉谱分析得出的心脏压力反射功能的非侵入性测量指标。为了证明这些压力反射估计值之间的差异,14名患者通过静脉注射接受了依托咪酯(0.3毫克/千克推注和0.9毫克/千克/小时输注)、利多卡因(60毫克)和维库溴铵(0.1毫克/千克)。作者发现,依托咪酯麻醉后自发性压力反射敏感性和高频增益降低(p <0.05),而中频增益保持不变。虽然同时进行了比较,但自发性压力反射敏感性、高频增益和中频增益并非以平行方式变化。在另外5名仅接受生理盐水的患者中,测量值未发生变化。作者得出结论,自发性压力反射敏感性、高频增益和中频增益不可相互替代。压力反射控制的实验结果取决于所选择的参数。