Kippenes H, Gavin P R, Sande R D, Rogers D, Sweet V
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-7060, USA.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2000 Jul-Aug;41(4):371-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb02090.x.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the repositioning accuracy of different positioning devices in order to determine their applicability for potential use in conformal radiation therapy for animals. Forty-four animals with spontaneous tumors of the head were included. The animals were divided into 3 groups determined according to the positioning device used. Group 1 animals were positioned using a thermoplastic mask. Group 2 animals were positioned using a head holder. Group 3 animals were positioned using the head holder and an inflatable pillow. The time of presentation determined which position device was used. Port films of the 44 patients were reviewed retrospectively, and the repositioning precision was recorded by measurements in three orthogonal planes. Groups 2 and 3 had significantly better repositioning accuracy (P < or = 0.05) compared to Group 1. The position variation was not significantly different (P < or = 0.05) between Groups 2 and 3 in the lateral and longitudinal direction. Group 3 had a median reposition variation of 0.5 to 1.0 mm, with a standard deviation of 1.0 to 1.5 mm.
这项回顾性研究的目的是评估不同定位设备的重新定位准确性,以确定它们在动物适形放射治疗中的潜在适用性。纳入了44只患有头部自发性肿瘤的动物。根据所使用的定位设备将动物分为3组。第1组动物使用热塑性面罩进行定位。第2组动物使用头部固定器进行定位。第3组动物使用头部固定器和充气枕头进行定位。就诊时间决定使用哪种定位设备。对44例患者的定位片进行回顾性分析,并通过在三个正交平面上的测量记录重新定位精度。与第1组相比,第2组和第3组的重新定位准确性明显更好(P≤0.05)。第2组和第3组在横向和纵向方向上的位置变化无显著差异(P≤0.05)。第3组的重新定位变化中位数为0.5至1.0毫米,标准差为1.0至1.5毫米。