• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.

作者信息

Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu I, Ulusu T, Genç Y

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Dent. 2000 Sep;28(7):481-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00029-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00029-4
PMID:10960751
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the leakage of three resin dentine bonding agents (Prime and Bond, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Probond) and a glass ionomer dentine bonding agent (GC Fujibond LC), in cervical cavities prepared in primary and permanent molar teeth restored with a hybrid composite resin (Tetric).

METHODS

Cervical cavities without a bevel at the cavo-surface margins were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted primary and permanent molar teeth. After being restored, the teeth were stored for 1 week in a saline solution at 37 degrees C and then thermally cycled between 5 and 55 degrees C. Marginal leakage was determined subsequently using a radioactive isotope containing 45Ca and an autoradiographic technique.

RESULTS

The results revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in microleakage of the bond between permanent and primary teeth dentine and Fuji Bond LC and Probond dentine bonding agents. The difference between permanent and primary teeth groups for gingival values of the Prime and Bond 2.1 group U=22.5, p=0.0355 and the Scotchbond Multipurpose group U=24.0, p=0.0406 were statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the occlusal and gingival microleakage values in either primary or permanent teeth with Prime and Bond 2.1, Fuji Bond LC and Probond except the difference at Scotchbond Multipurpose in primary teeth. For primary teeth gingival margins, none of the bonding systems were significantly different from the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that although no statistically significant differences were found between test and control group values, the use of Fuji II LC in cervical cavities with cementum margins in primary teeth would provide the best resistance to microleakage among the test materials while the use of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose would provide the best resistance to microleakage in cervical cavities with cementum margins in permanent teeth.

摘要

相似文献

1
Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
J Dent. 2000 Sep;28(7):481-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00029-4.
2
Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.采用共固化与预固化技术应用的光固化树脂和树脂改性玻璃离子牙本质粘结剂的微渗漏
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):292-8.
3
Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Sep;25(9):666-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00296.x.
4
Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.V类树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和复合体修复体的微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):610-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70217-9.
5
The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.牙本质黏结剂和垫底材料对乳恒牙Ⅱ类树脂复合体修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):223-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.h551um6313618465.
6
Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.使用湿法和干法粘结技术的充填牙本质粘结剂的边缘微渗漏
Am J Dent. 2000 Apr;13(2):93-7.
7
Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.唾液污染后V类洞型中Compoglass-F和Dyract-AP复合体的微渗漏情况。
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-42.
8
In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.采用两步酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀牙本质黏结系统对有和无衬层的后牙复合树脂微渗漏的体外比较。
Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.2341/10-215-L. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
9
Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.II类洞修复中四种复合树脂体系的微渗漏
SADJ. 2009 Nov;64(10):484-8.
10
Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.用汞合金和树脂复合材料修复体评估牙科粘结系统:微渗漏和粘结强度结果的比较
Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):512-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins.当代复合树脂的体积聚合收缩率
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Oct;15(5):448-52. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000500014.