Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2000 Jun;13(3):149-55.
To investigate attitudes and expectations of Italian physicians relative to intensive metabolic control in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and to compare them with the recent results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS).
Before the results of the UKPDS were published, a postal questionnaire was sent to 284 diabetologists practising in 237 outpatient diabetes clinics and 107 general practitioners (GPs) to explore their attitudes toward a tight metabolic control and target fasting blood glucose (FBG) level used. We also investigated clinicians' preferences for an aggressive policy in specific patient subgroups and their expectations about the impact of a strict metabolic control on some of the major end-points included in the UKPDS study.
The questionnaire was filled in by 199 diabetologists and 94 GPs (response rate=75%). Although 54% of the respondents declared to seek a strict metabolic control, only 15% of them used target FBG levels < or = 110 mg/dl, while 38% pursued values > 130 mg/dl. GPs declared significantly less often than diabetologists to adopt an aggressive policy (35% vs 65%, p=0.001), and chose more often a target for FBG > 130 mg/dl (44% vs 36%, p=0.02). Only 62% of doctors favouring a strict metabolic control for the average T2DM patient would recommend it for women and 36% for subjects with low educational level. Diabetologists were significantly more likely than GPs to pursue an aggressive policy in obese subjects (70% vs 61%, p=0.03), women (55% vs 18%, p=0.001) and patients with other cardiovascular risk factors (92% vs 81%, p=0.02). The vast majority of respondents did expect a positive impact of a tight metabolic control on micro- and macrovascular complications and on overall mortality.
Italian doctors have extremely heterogeneous attitudes and too optimistic expectations relative to intensive metabolic control in T2DM patients. To facilitate the adoption of UKPDS findings, clear guidelines are needed, providing specific recommendations about subgroups of patients showing a higher risk of complications as well as of inappropriate care.
调查意大利医生对2型糖尿病(T2DM)强化代谢控制的态度和期望,并将其与英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)的最新结果进行比较。
在UKPDS结果公布之前,向在237家门诊糖尿病诊所执业的284名糖尿病专家和107名全科医生(GPs)发送了一份邮政调查问卷,以探讨他们对严格代谢控制和所采用的空腹血糖(FBG)目标水平的态度。我们还调查了临床医生对特定患者亚组积极治疗策略的偏好,以及他们对严格代谢控制对UKPDS研究中一些主要终点影响的期望。
199名糖尿病专家和94名全科医生填写了问卷(回复率=75%)。虽然54%的受访者表示寻求严格的代谢控制,但只有15%的人使用的FBG目标水平≤110mg/dl,而38%的人追求的目标值>130mg/dl。全科医生宣称采取积极治疗策略的频率明显低于糖尿病专家(35%对65%,p=0.001),并且更常选择FBG目标>130mg/dl(44%对36%,p=0.02)。对于一般T2DM患者倾向于严格代谢控制的医生中,只有62%会推荐给女性,36%会推荐给低教育水平的患者。糖尿病专家在肥胖患者(70%对61%,p=0.03)、女性(55%对18%,p=0.001)和有其他心血管危险因素的患者(92%对81%,p=0.02)中采取积极治疗策略的可能性明显高于全科医生。绝大多数受访者确实期望严格的代谢控制对微血管和大血管并发症以及总体死亡率产生积极影响。
意大利医生对T2DM患者强化代谢控制的态度极其不一致,期望也过于乐观。为了促进UKPDS研究结果的应用,需要明确的指南,针对并发症风险较高以及治疗不当的患者亚组提供具体建议。