• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[方法漫谈。二十一。如何得出问卷各单项的加权总分]

[Roaming through methodology. XXI. How to arrive at a weighed total score of separate items of a questionnaire].

作者信息

van Breukelen G J, Berger M P

机构信息

Universiteit Maastricht, capaciteitsgroep Methodologie en Statistiek.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Aug 12;144(33):1580-4.

PMID:10965366
Abstract

In medical research the responses of patients to a number of items are often combined into a summary measure or total score for a more general patient characteristic, such as mobility. Clinical and statistical criteria exist for determining the weight of each question in the total score. The choice of weights may affect the differences between patients. The total score is often analysed statistically as if it had interval level of measurement, thereby allowing conclusions about the size of differences between patients, but it has merely an ordinal level. The incorrectness of the interval assumption may also affect differences between patients or patient groups. Finally, differences between patients are less dependent on the weighting of the items and on the assumption of an interval scale as the total score is based on more homogeneous items. Standard statistical software contains statistical methods for determining the homogeneity as well as the weights.

摘要

在医学研究中,患者对多个项目的反应常常被合并为一个综合指标或总分,以反映更一般的患者特征,如活动能力。存在临床和统计标准来确定总分中每个问题的权重。权重的选择可能会影响患者之间的差异。总分通常会进行统计分析,就好像它具有区间测量水平一样,从而能够得出关于患者之间差异大小的结论,但实际上它仅仅具有顺序测量水平。区间假设的不正确性也可能影响患者或患者组之间的差异。最后,患者之间的差异较少依赖于项目的加权以及区间量表的假设,因为总分是基于更同质的项目得出的。标准统计软件包含用于确定同质性以及权重的统计方法。

相似文献

1
[Roaming through methodology. XXI. How to arrive at a weighed total score of separate items of a questionnaire].[方法漫谈。二十一。如何得出问卷各单项的加权总分]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Aug 12;144(33):1580-4.
2
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
3
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.
4
[Roaming through methodology: XXIX. P].[方法学漫谈:二十九. P]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Jan 13;145(2):74-7.
5
Dysfunctional voiding and incontinence scoring system: quantitative evaluation of incontinence symptoms in pediatric population.功能性排尿障碍和尿失禁评分系统:儿科人群尿失禁症状的定量评估。
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):969-73. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152183.91888.f6.
6
Predicting gender differences as latent variables: summed scores, and individual item responses: a methods case study.将性别差异预测为潜在变量:总分及单个项目反应——一个方法案例研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Oct 25;2:59. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-59.
7
Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.为何测量对于评估患者视力结果至关重要。
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;84(8):675-82. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181339f44.
8
Modeling and inference for an ordinal effect size measure.有序效应量度量的建模与推断
Stat Med. 2008 May 10;27(10):1703-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.3079.
9
Visual analog scale questionnaire to assess quality of life specific to each symptom of the International Prostate Symptom Score.用于评估国际前列腺症状评分中每种症状特定生活质量的视觉模拟量表问卷。
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):665-71. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.031.
10
[Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].[完美主义中的失败影响与性别差异]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):125-35.