Freeman R V, Eagle K A, Bates E R, Werns S W, Kline-Rogers E, Karavite D, Moscucci M
University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0366, USA.
Am Heart J. 2000 Sep;140(3):511-20. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.109223.
Our objective was to compare artificial neural networks (ANNs) with logistic regression for prediction of in-hospital death after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and to assess the impact of guiding initial ANN variable selection with univariate analysis.
ANNs can detect complex patterns within data. Criticisms include the unpredictability of variable selection. They have not previously been applied to outcomes modeling for percutaneous coronary interventions.
A database of consecutive (n = 3019) percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures from an academic tertiary referral center between July 1994 and July 1997 was used. An ANN was developed for 38 variables (unguided model) (n = 1554). A second model was developed with predictors from an univariate analysis (guided model). Both were compared with a logistic regression model developed from the same database. Model validation was performed on independent data (n = 1465). Model predictive accuracy was assessed by the area under receiver operating characteristic curves. Goodness of fit was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic.
Sixty unguided and guided ANNs were developed. Predictive accuracy and model calibration for all models were similar for training data but were significantly better for logistic regression for independent validation data. Overestimation of event rate in higher risk patients accounted for the majority of discrepancy in model calibration for the ANNs. This difference was partially amended by guiding variable selection.
ANNs were able to model in-hospital death after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty when guiding variable selection. However, performance was not better than traditional modeling techniques. Further investigations are needed to understand the impact of this methodology on outcomes analysis.
我们的目的是比较人工神经网络(ANN)和逻辑回归在预测经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术后院内死亡方面的性能,并评估单变量分析对指导初始ANN变量选择的影响。
ANN可以检测数据中的复杂模式。其缺点包括变量选择的不可预测性。此前它们尚未应用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局建模。
使用了一个来自学术三级转诊中心1994年7月至1997年7月连续(n = 3019)例经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的数据库。针对38个变量开发了一个ANN(非指导模型)(n = 1554)。第二个模型是根据单变量分析的预测变量开发的(指导模型)。将两者与从同一数据库开发的逻辑回归模型进行比较。在独立数据(n = 1465)上进行模型验证。通过受试者操作特征曲线下的面积评估模型预测准确性。用Hosmer-Lemeshow统计量评估拟合优度。
开发了60个非指导和指导的ANN。所有模型在训练数据上的预测准确性和模型校准相似,但在独立验证数据上逻辑回归的表现明显更好。ANNs模型校准差异的大部分原因是对高风险患者事件发生率的高估。通过指导变量选择,这种差异得到了部分修正。
在指导变量选择时,ANN能够对经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术后的院内死亡进行建模。然而,其性能并不优于传统建模技术。需要进一步研究以了解这种方法对结局分析的影响。