Cook J
Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1999 Sep;49(3 Suppl 2):11S-14S.
In nutritional studies to assess the prevalence of iron deficiency, it has been common practice to define 3 stages of increasing severity: iron storage depletion as defined by low serum ferritin, mild iron deficiency without anemia based on laboratory evidence of iron deficient erythropoiesis (IDE), and overt iron deficiency anemia (IDA). While this approach provides a broad perspective of impaired iron status, the main liabilities of iron lack are associated only with the more advanced stage of IDA. Consequently, the hemoglobin determination can be used to screen for nutritionally significant iron deficiency. Having identified anemia, more specific laboratory studies are needed to establish iron lack as the cause. The traditional measurements of iron deficient erythropoiesis (IDE) such as a low transferrin saturation, elevated erythrocyte protoporphyrin, or decreased mean corpuscular volume are commonly used. The major drawback in using these parameters is that they are affected similarly in individuals with the anemia of chronic disease (ACD), a common form of anemia in low socioeconomic populations. Because iron stores are invariably absent in individuals with uncomplicated IDA, a low serum ferritin concentration below 20 micrograms/L confirms the diagnosis of IDA when anemia is present. The main limitation of the serum ferritin is that it is falsely elevated to within the normal range when IDA develops in individuals with concurrent infection or chronic inflammation. When this occurs in a clinical setting, a bone marrow examination is commonly performed to identify IDA. Recent investigations indicate that this cumbersome procedure can be avoided by measuring an important new iron-related measurement, the serum transferrin receptor (TfR). Because the synthesis of TfR is upregulated with tissue iron deficiency, IDA can be identified readily by an elevated serum TfR. Importantly, the serum TfR is normal in individuals with the ACD but becomes elevated if these individuals develop IDA. The optimal combination of laboratory measurements for detecting IDA is the hemoglobin, serum ferritin and serum TfR.
在评估缺铁患病率的营养研究中,通常将严重程度增加的三个阶段定义如下:血清铁蛋白降低所定义的铁储存耗竭、基于缺铁性红细胞生成(IDE)实验室证据的无贫血轻度缺铁以及明显缺铁性贫血(IDA)。虽然这种方法能提供铁状态受损的广泛视角,但缺铁的主要危害仅与IDA的更晚期阶段相关。因此,血红蛋白测定可用于筛查具有营养意义的缺铁情况。确定贫血后,需要更具体的实验室研究来确定缺铁为病因。常用于检测缺铁性红细胞生成(IDE)的传统指标包括低转铁蛋白饱和度、红细胞原卟啉升高或平均红细胞体积降低。使用这些参数的主要缺点是,在患有慢性病贫血(ACD)的个体中,它们会受到类似影响,而ACD是低社会经济人群中常见的贫血形式。由于单纯性IDA患者总是缺乏铁储存,当存在贫血时,血清铁蛋白浓度低于20微克/升可确诊IDA。血清铁蛋白的主要局限性在于,当并发感染或慢性炎症的个体发生IDA时,其会错误地升高至正常范围内。在临床环境中出现这种情况时,通常会进行骨髓检查以确定IDA。最近的研究表明,通过测量一项重要的新的铁相关指标——血清转铁蛋白受体(TfR),可以避免这种繁琐的程序。由于TfR的合成随组织缺铁而上调,血清TfR升高可轻松识别IDA。重要的是,ACD患者的血清TfR正常,但如果这些患者发展为IDA,其血清TfR会升高。检测IDA的最佳实验室指标组合是血红蛋白、血清铁蛋白和血清TfR。