Suárez De Lezo J, Medina A, Pan M, Romero M, Segura J, Pavlovic D, Hernández E, Delgado A, Caballero E, Siles J R, Franco M, Mesa D, Lafuente M
Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Sep;51(1):33-41. doi: 10.1002/1522-726x(200009)51:1<33::aid-ccd9>3.0.co;2-5.
Percutaneous device occlusion of secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) is becoming an accepted alternative to surgical closure. This method allows us to evaluate patients with complex conditions for treatment. From a total of 70 patients with ASD evaluated for percutaneous closure, we selected for analysis 28 who had complex conditions. The mean age was 36+/-23 yr (range, 4-72). Six had heart failure, and of these six, three had atrial fibrillation. At cardiac catheterization, the pulmonary pressure was 47+/-24 mm Hg, and the QP/QS was 1.7+/-0.4; two patients had bidirectional shunt and systemic pulmonary pressure. Two patients received a buttoned device and 26 an Amplatzer septal occluder. The groups of patients with complex conditions were separated into the following groups. Group I (n = 4) underwent combined treatment of associated anomalies. Two patients had pulmonary stenosis, one had mitral stenosis, and one had an aortic root-left atrium fistula. They were treated in or during with the same procedure by combined transcatheter techniques (balloon valvuloplasty and fistula occlusion) before ASD occlusion. Group II (n = 9) had multiple defects (cribiform or two separate holes). They were treated with a single device in five instances and with two separate devices in four cases. Group III (n = 14) had large (32+/-3 mm) single defects. Nine of them underwent successful implantation using a device 33+/-3 mm in diameter; in the remaining five patients the device was removed because of instability. Group IV (n = 3) had residual defects after previous partial device occlusion. All three defects were successfully occluded with a second device. No movement or interference with the first device was observed. Group V (n = 6) had severe pulmonary hypertension (86+/-16 mm Hg). Immediately after ASD occlusion we observed significant relief in these patients (67+/-14 mm Hg; P<0.01). There were no major complications; all 23 patients with successful implants were discharged without symptoms 2-7 days later; one patient with atrial fibrillation recovered sinus rhythm. The follow-up (8+/-5 mo) Doppler echo study showed complete ASD occlusion in 22 patients and a peak pulmonary pressure of 30+/-14 mm Hg. We conclude that transcatheter occlusion of ASDs is an effective and safe treatment for patients with complex anatomic or physiopathologic conditions, as evaluated by short-term follow-up.
经皮装置封堵继发孔房间隔缺损(ASD)正成为一种被认可的替代外科手术闭合的方法。这种方法使我们能够评估患有复杂病情的患者以便进行治疗。在总共70例接受经皮封堵评估的ASD患者中,我们选择了28例患有复杂病情的患者进行分析。平均年龄为36±23岁(范围4 - 72岁)。6例有心力衰竭,其中3例合并心房颤动。心导管检查时,肺动脉压为47±24 mmHg,肺循环血流量与体循环血流量之比(QP/QS)为1.7±0.4;2例患者存在双向分流和体肺循环压力。2例患者接受纽扣式装置,26例接受Amplatzer房间隔封堵器。患有复杂病情的患者组被分为以下几组。第一组(n = 4)接受相关异常的联合治疗。2例有肺动脉狭窄,1例有二尖瓣狭窄,1例有主动脉根部 - 左心房瘘。在封堵ASD之前,他们通过联合经导管技术(球囊瓣膜成形术和瘘管封堵)在同一手术中或手术期间进行治疗。第二组(n = 9)有多个缺损(筛状或两个分开的孔)。5例用单个装置治疗,4例用两个分开的装置治疗。第三组(n = 14)有大的(32±3 mm)单个缺损。其中9例使用直径33±3 mm的装置成功植入;其余5例患者因装置不稳定而取出。第四组(n = 3)在先前部分装置封堵后有残余缺损。所有3个缺损均用第二个装置成功封堵。未观察到对第一个装置的移动或干扰。第五组(n = 6)有严重肺动脉高压(86±16 mmHg)。在ASD封堵后立即观察到这些患者病情明显缓解(67±14 mmHg;P<0.01)。无重大并发症;所有23例成功植入的患者在2 - 7天后无症状出院;1例心房颤动患者恢复窦性心律。随访(8±5个月)的多普勒超声心动图研究显示22例患者ASD完全封堵,肺动脉压峰值为30±14 mmHg。我们得出结论,通过短期随访评估,经导管封堵ASD对于患有复杂解剖或生理病理状况的患者是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。