Avital A, Godfrey S, Springer C
Institute of Pulmonology, Hadassah University Hospital and Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000 Sep;30(3):207-14. doi: 10.1002/1099-0496(200009)30:3<207::aid-ppul5>3.0.co;2-z.
Bronchial hyperreactivity is a characteristic feature of asthma and can be evaluated by different challenges. The aim of this study was to compare exercise, methacholine (MCH), and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) challenges in 135 children and young adults (mean age +/- SD, 12.4+/-3.9 years) with asthma, and to examine the utility of the different challenges in predicting those children with asthma likely to require prophylactic antiinflammatory treatment. The sensitivity of MCH challenge in detecting bronchial hyperreactivity (at or below 8 mg/mL) was 98%, that of AMP challenge (at or below 200 mg/mL) 95.5%, and that of exercise (more than 8.2% fall in FEV(1)) was 65%. There was a significant difference between mild asthmatic children (85 patients, intermittent asthma, step 1 of NIH guidelines) and moderate asthmatics (50 patients, steps 2 and 3 of guidelines) in relation to the logarithmic mean provocation concentration to elicit a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) to MCH (0.49 mg/mL vs. 0.15 mg/mL, P<0.00001), that to AMP (7.67 mg/mL vs. 3.60 mg/mL, P = 0.001), and in relation to the mean percent fall in FEV(1) after exercise (13.9% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity curves between the two severity groups of asthma were constructed, and the intersection point of the two curves for each type of challenge was determined. When mild asthmatics were compared to moderate asthmatics, the intersection points for MCH, AMP, and exercise were 66%, 63%, and 61%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the three challenges for the two severity groups of asthma showed that methacholine was a better discriminating challenge between the severity groups than the other two challenges. We conclude that the sensitivities of AMP and MCH challenges in the detection of bronchial hyperreactivity in children and young adults with asthma are very similar and higher than that of exercise. There is a significant difference between mild and moderate asthmatics within the three bronchial challenges, with MCH discriminating better than AMP or exercise between groups.
支气管高反应性是哮喘的一个特征,可通过不同的激发试验进行评估。本研究的目的是比较运动、乙酰甲胆碱(MCH)和5'-单磷酸腺苷(AMP)激发试验在135名哮喘儿童和青年(平均年龄±标准差,12.4±3.9岁)中的效果,并检验不同激发试验在预测哪些哮喘儿童可能需要预防性抗炎治疗方面的效用。MCH激发试验检测支气管高反应性(浓度在8mg/mL及以下)的敏感性为98%,AMP激发试验(浓度在200mg/mL及以下)的敏感性为95.5%,运动激发试验(第一秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)下降超过8.2%)的敏感性为65%。轻度哮喘儿童(85例,间歇性哮喘,美国国立卫生研究院指南第1步)和中度哮喘患者(50例,指南第2步和第3步)在引起FEV₁下降20%的对数平均激发浓度(PC₂₀)方面,对MCH的反应存在显著差异(0.49mg/mL对0.15mg/mL,P<0.00001),对AMP的反应也有显著差异(7.67mg/mL对3.60mg/mL,P = 0.001),在运动后FEV₁的平均下降百分比方面同样存在显著差异(13.9%对22.0%,P = 0.001)。构建了哮喘两个严重程度组之间的敏感性和特异性曲线,并确定了每种激发试验的两条曲线的交点。当轻度哮喘患者与中度哮喘患者进行比较时,MCH、AMP和运动激发试验的交点分别为66%、63%和61%。对哮喘两个严重程度组的三种激发试验进行逻辑回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,结果显示乙酰甲胆碱在区分严重程度组方面比其他两种激发试验更好。我们得出结论,AMP和MCH激发试验在检测哮喘儿童和青年支气管高反应性方面的敏感性非常相似,且高于运动激发试验。在三种支气管激发试验中,轻度和中度哮喘患者之间存在显著差异,其中MCH在区分不同组方面比AMP或运动激发试验表现更好。