Imbeault P, Couillard C, Tremblay A, Després J P, Mauriège P
Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4.
J Lipid Res. 2000 Sep;41(9):1367-75.
This study examined the postprandial lipemia of two groups of men displaying similar age, body weight, and regional fat distribution, but characterized by either low (n = 11) or high (n = 15) alpha(2)-adrenergic sensitivity of subcutaneous abdominal adipocytes. In addition to fat cell lipolysis, adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (AT-LPL) as well as postheparin plasma LPL activities were measured in the fasting state. Fasting AT-LPL and PH-LPL activities were similar in both groups. Maximal adipose cell lipolysis induced by isoproterenol (beta-adrenergic agonist) as well as the beta-adrenergic sensitivity did not differ between both groups of men. The selective alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist UK-14304 promoted a similar antilipolytic response in subcutaneous abdominal adipocytes from both groups. However, the alpha(2)-adrenergic sensitivity, defined as the dose of UK-14304 that produced half-maximal inhibition of lipolysis (IC(50)), was significantly different between groups (P < 0.0001). Men with low versus high subcutaneous abdominal fat cell alpha(2)-adrenergic sensitivity showed higher fasting TG levels. In the whole group, a positive relationship was observed between log-transformed IC(50) UK-14304 values of subcutaneous adipocytes and fasting TG levels (r = 0.39, P < 0.05), suggesting that a low abdominal adipose cell alpha(2)-adrenergic sensitivity is associated with high TG levels. After the consumption of a high-fat meal, subjects with low subcutaneous abdominal adipose cell alpha(2)-adrenergic sensitivity showed higher TG levels in total, medium, and small triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) fractions at 0- to 6-h time points than men with high adipocyte alpha(2)-adrenergic sensitivity (P values ranging from 0.01 to 0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the fasting TG concentration was the only variable retained as a significant predictor of the area under the curve of TG levels in total TRL fractions (73% of variance) among independent variables such as body weight, percent body fat, visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue accumulation measured by CT, as well as subcutaneous abdominal fat cell alpha(2)-adrenoceptor sensitivity. Taken together, these results indicate that a reduced antilipolytic sensitivity of subcutaneous abdominal adipocytes to catecholamines may increase fasting TG levels, which in turn play a role in the etiology of an impaired postprandial TRL clearance in men.
本研究检测了两组男性的餐后血脂情况,这两组男性年龄、体重和局部脂肪分布相似,但腹部皮下脂肪细胞的α(2)-肾上腺素能敏感性存在差异,一组较低(n = 11),另一组较高(n = 15)。除了脂肪细胞脂解作用外,还在空腹状态下测量了脂肪组织脂蛋白脂肪酶(AT-LPL)以及肝素后血浆LPL活性。两组的空腹AT-LPL和PH-LPL活性相似。异丙肾上腺素(β-肾上腺素能激动剂)诱导的最大脂肪细胞脂解作用以及β-肾上腺素能敏感性在两组男性之间没有差异。选择性α(2)-肾上腺素能激动剂UK-14304在两组的腹部皮下脂肪细胞中均促进了相似的抗脂解反应。然而,两组之间定义为产生半数最大脂解抑制作用(IC(50))的UK-14304剂量所代表的α(2)-肾上腺素能敏感性存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。腹部皮下脂肪细胞α(2)-肾上腺素能敏感性较低的男性与较高的男性相比,空腹甘油三酯(TG)水平更高。在整个研究组中,观察到皮下脂肪细胞UK-14304的对数转换IC(50)值与空腹TG水平之间存在正相关关系(r = 0.39,P < 0.05),这表明腹部脂肪细胞α(2)-肾上腺素能敏感性较低与高TG水平相关。在食用高脂餐后,腹部皮下脂肪细胞α(2)-肾上腺素能敏感性较低的受试者在0至6小时时间点的总、中、小富含甘油三酯脂蛋白(TRL)组分中的TG水平高于脂肪细胞α(2)-肾上腺素能敏感性较高的男性(P值范围为0.01至0.05)。逐步回归分析表明,在体重、体脂百分比、通过CT测量的内脏和腹部皮下脂肪组织堆积以及腹部皮下脂肪细胞α(2)-肾上腺素能受体敏感性等自变量中,空腹TG浓度是唯一保留的作为总TRL组分中TG水平曲线下面积的显著预测因子(方差的73%)。综上所述,这些结果表明腹部皮下脂肪细胞对儿茶酚胺的抗脂解敏感性降低可能会增加空腹TG水平,这反过来在男性餐后TRL清除受损的病因中起作用。