Roos D E, Davis S R, O'Brien P C, Hoskin P J, Spry N A, Burmeister B H, Turner S L, Bernshaw D M
Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia.
Australas Radiol. 2000 Aug;44(3):303-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00818.x.
In February 1996 the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) initiated a two-arm, multicentre, prospective randomized trial on radiotherapy for neuropathic pain due to bone metastases (TROG 96.05). This trial compares the response to a single 8-Gy fraction with 20 Gy in five fractions. The accrual target is 270 patients. In order to evaluate compliance with eligibility criteria after approximately 1 year of accrual, an independent audit of the first 42 randomized patients was commissioned. This found that only one of these patients did not have genuine neuropathic pain, but that this patient and seven others (19%) had infringements of other eligibility/exclusion criteria for the trial. Accordingly it was decided to continue the full audit up to 90 patients. This detected no further patients without genuine neuropathic pain, and found only one other eligibility infringement (1/48; 2%). It is concluded that this quality assurance (QA) measure undertaken early in the trial led to significantly improved clinician awareness of, and compliance with, eligibility/exclusion criteria. It also enabled an accurate comparison of outcome data for all randomized versus all eligible patients at the time of the preplanned first interim analysis at 90 patients. In view of the excellent compliance demonstrated in the second audit, a one-in-five sampling is proposed for future audits from centres that have already accrued at least five consecutive eligible patients. This is consistent with TROG QA guidelines now operational.
1996年2月,跨塔斯曼放射肿瘤学组(TROG)启动了一项双臂、多中心、前瞻性随机试验,用于治疗骨转移所致神经性疼痛的放射疗法(TROG 96.05)。该试验比较单次8 Gy分割剂量与分五次给予20 Gy剂量的疗效。预计入组患者270例。为了在入组约1年后评估对入选标准的依从性,委托对前42例随机分组患者进行独立审核。结果发现这些患者中只有1例没有真正的神经性疼痛,但该患者及其他7例患者(19%)违反了试验的其他入选/排除标准。因此,决定继续对90例患者进行全面审核。结果未发现其他没有真正神经性疼痛的患者,仅发现另外1例违反入选标准的情况(1/48;2%)。结论是,在试验早期采取的这种质量保证(QA)措施显著提高了临床医生对入选/排除标准的认识和依从性。这也使得在对90例患者进行预先计划的首次中期分析时,能够准确比较所有随机分组患者与所有符合条件患者的结局数据。鉴于第二次审核显示出的良好依从性,建议对已经连续入选至少5例符合条件患者的中心,在未来审核中采用五分之一抽样。这与目前实施的TROG质量保证指南一致。