• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Comparison of coronary angiography by the left radial and right femoral approach with 4 French catheters].

作者信息

Hudelo C, Maillard L, Quilliet L, Desveaux B, Fichaux O, Delplace C, Grimbert M, Arwidson P, Raynaud P

机构信息

Service de cardiologie A, CHU Trousseau, Tours.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2000 Jul;93(7):813-9.

PMID:10975032
Abstract

The radial arterial approach has been shown to be valuable for coronary angioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the left radial and right femoral approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography. The authors performed a prospective non-randomised series of consecutive diagnostic coronary angiogrammes with small calibre (4 french) catheters by the left radial (100 patients) and right femoral (100 patients) arteries. The feasibility, results and complications were compared. The study showed that diagnostic coronary angiography with 4 F catheters is feasible with a high success rate, both from the left radial (99%) and right femoral (100%) approaches (NS). The duration of the procedure tends to be longer when the radial approach is used (19.2 +/- 1.3 min) than by the femoral artery (16.3 +/- 1.1 min) (p = 0.06). The duration of irradiation is longer with the radial approach (6.7 +/- 1.2 vs 4.9 +/- 0.9 min) (p = 0.0001). Local complications are minor by either approach (N = 5 vs N = 6 patients; p = NS), and there were no major complications. The tolerance of the procedure was not as good when the radial artery was used (N = 5) compared with the femoral artery (N = 1 patient) because of arterial spasm when the catheters were changed. The authors conclude that the left radial and right femoral arteries can be used routinely for diagnostic coronary angiography with small catheters (4 French). The left radial approach allows immediate mobilisation of the patient but the duration of the procedure and the exposure to irradiation are longer.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Comparison of coronary angiography by the left radial and right femoral approach with 4 French catheters].
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2000 Jul;93(7):813-9.
2
Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study.经桡动脉或股动脉途径的冠状动脉造影:CARAFE研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Feb;52(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/1522-726x(200102)52:2<181::aid-ccd1044>3.0.co;2-g.
3
Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Dec;39(4):365-70. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199612)39:4<365::AID-CCD8>3.0.CO;2-B.
4
[Randomized comparison of 4F and 6F catheters for diagnostic coronary angiographies via the femoral approach].经股动脉途径进行诊断性冠状动脉造影时4F和6F导管的随机对照研究
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2000 Jan;93(1):35-9.
5
[Coronary angiography by a radial artery approach: feasibility, learning curve. One operator's experience].[经桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影:可行性、学习曲线。一位操作者的经验]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1998 Feb;91(2):209-15.
6
Comparison of the feasibility and effectiveness of transradial coronary angiography via right versus left radial artery approaches (from the PREVAIL Study).经右桡动脉与左桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影的可行性和有效性比较(来自 PREVAIL 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 15;110(6):771-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 May 30.
7
Left radial versus right radial approach for coronary artery catheterization: a prospective comparison.左桡动脉与右桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影:前瞻性比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Apr;25(2):203-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00689.x. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
8
Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: an analysis of 500 cases.股动脉入路禁忌患者的桡动脉冠状动脉造影:500例分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jan;61(1):60-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10708.
9
Feasibility and application of single 5F multipurpose catheter in coronary and peripheral angiography via a transradial approach.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉和外周血管造影中单根 5F 多功能导管的可行性和应用
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Sep 1;151(2):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
10
[Percutaneous radial approach for coronary angiography].经皮桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影术
G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Oct;26(10):1149-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the usefulness of coronary catheters and 4 Fr insertion sets for transradial access coronarography in comparison with catheters and 5 Fr sets.与导管和5F套装相比,评估冠状动脉导管和4F插入套装在经桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影中的实用性。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(4):332-6. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.38860. Epub 2013 Nov 18.