Amann M, Lutz M
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.
J Hazard Mater. 2000 Nov 3;78(1-3):41-62. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00216-8.
Complying with the obligation in the current ozone directive, the European Commission came forward in 1999 with a strategy to combat tropospheric ozone together with a proposed revision of the air quality legislation for this pollutant. As a daughter legislation under the 1996 Framework Directive on Air Quality, the proposed ozone daughter directive defines for the first time (interim) air quality targets for ozone to be attained by 2010, complemented by long-term objectives for ozone based on the guideline values of the World Health Organisation. It also sets out enhanced requirements for monitoring and assessment of ozone concentrations, as well as minimum criteria for appropriate information of the public about the measured air pollution. In the past, abatement strategies against air pollution consisted of concrete obligations for controlling emissions derived solely on the basis of technical and economic aspects, covering specific types of installations or activities, thus with no direct quantitative relationship to the level of air pollution let alone to its effects. In compensating this deficit, the Commission presented, as a complement to the existing sectoral legislation, a proposal for a directive on national emission ceilings (NEC) which quantifies emission targets for every Member State to bring its total precursor emissions by 2010 down to levels being considered as necessary to achieve everywhere on a regional scale the air quality targets set in the ozone daughter directive. As the core element of the ozone abatement strategy, the national ceilings for emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO(2)), nitrogen oxides (NO(x)), ammonia (NH(3)) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) were derived from a cost-effectiveness analysis integrating information on economic, technical, physical and biological aspects of ozone pollution and abatement. This integrated assessment considers the potential and costs for further emission control in the various economic sectors in the Member States and combines this with information on ozone formation and transport processes in the atmosphere and with indicators for the impact of ozone on human health and environmental. Reflecting the discussions with Member States and stakeholders, a number of decisive steps in the process of deriving the national emission ceilings are presented here: the way of framing interim objectives, how to choose an appropriate ambition level, aspects of how to cope with uncertainties in the model and the input data and how to treat extreme meteorological situations and resolve problems in the spatial distribution of the interim objectives given the different size of countries. Finally, the paper explains the scenario underpinning the proposed national emission ceilings, its environmental gains and the distribution of cost incurring for emission control measures in Member States.
为履行现行臭氧指令中的义务,欧盟委员会于1999年提出了一项应对对流层臭氧的战略,并提议修订针对该污染物的空气质量立法。作为1996年《空气质量框架指令》下的子立法,拟议的臭氧子指令首次确定了到2010年要实现的(临时)臭氧空气质量目标,并以世界卫生组织的指导值为基础补充了臭氧的长期目标。它还对臭氧浓度监测和评估提出了更高要求,以及向公众提供有关实测空气污染的适当信息的最低标准。过去,空气污染减排战略仅基于技术和经济方面确定控制排放的具体义务,涵盖特定类型的设施或活动,因此与空气污染水平没有直接定量关系,更不用说与空气污染的影响了。为弥补这一不足,委员会提出了一项关于国家排放上限(NEC)指令的提案,作为对现有部门立法的补充,该提案对每个成员国的排放目标进行了量化,以使2010年其前体排放总量降至被认为在区域范围内实现臭氧子指令设定的空气质量目标所必需的水平。作为臭氧减排战略的核心要素,二氧化硫(SO₂)、氮氧化物(NOₓ)、氨(NH₃)和挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的国家排放上限来自一项成本效益分析,该分析整合了有关臭氧污染和减排的经济、技术、物理和生物方面的信息。这种综合评估考虑了成员国各经济部门进一步控制排放的潜力和成本,并将其与大气中臭氧形成和传输过程的信息以及臭氧对人类健康和环境影响的指标相结合。反映与成员国和利益相关者的讨论情况,本文介绍了确定国家排放上限过程中的一些决定性步骤:设定中期目标的方式、如何选择适当的抱负水平、如何应对模型和输入数据中的不确定性、如何处理极端气象情况以及鉴于各国规模不同如何解决中期目标空间分布中的问题。最后,本文解释了拟议的国家排放上限所依据的情景、其环境效益以及成员国排放控制措施的成本分配情况。