Lee S G, Lee Y J, Park K M, Hwang S, Min P C
Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University of College Medicine, 388-1 Poong Nap-Dong, Song Pa-Ku, Seoul 138-736, Korea.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(2):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s005340050167.
A positive correlation between absence of residual tumor at resection margins and long-term survival in the treatment of hilar bile duct carcinoma has encouraged some surgeons to use a more radical approach, including liver/portal vein resection and combined pancreatoduodenectomy. However, if liver resection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, it may not produce any overall benefit. This review was undertaken in an attempt to determine whether liver resection is a safe procedure and whether if has any beneficial effect over that of local bile duct excision alone, in terms of achieving curative resection and long-term survival. The records of 151 patients with hilar bile duct carcinoma surgically treated between June 1989 and December 1997 at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical resection was possible in 128 patients. The remaining 23 patients had surgical palliative drainage. Local bile duct excision alone was performed in 17 patients. Liver resection for tumor extending to secondary bile ducts or hepatic parenchyma was performed in 111 patients; portal vein resection was necessary in 29 of these 111 patients (26.1%) and pancreatoduodenectomy was combined in 18 patients (16.2%). Seven patients died during hospitalization after liver resection, an operative mortality of 6.3%. Margins of bile duct resection were free of tumor on histologic examination in 4 of the 17 local bile duct excisions, but in 86 of the 111 liver resections. The cumulative survival rate after local bile duct excision was 85.7% at 1 year, 42.9% at 2 years, 21.4% at 3 years, and 0% at 4 years. However, the survival rate after liver resection (excluding operative mortality) was 97.1% at 1 year, 72.8% at 2 years, 55.3% at 3 years, and 24.0% at 5 years. Survival and the percentage of patients with tumor-free resection margins after liver resection were superior to those after local bile duct excision. Resection of hilar bile duct carcinoma offers long-term survival only when surgery is aggressive and includes liver resection.
肝门部胆管癌切除术后切缘无残留肿瘤与长期生存之间的正相关关系,促使一些外科医生采用更激进的手术方式,包括肝/门静脉切除及联合胰十二指肠切除术。然而,如果肝切除伴随着显著的发病率和死亡率,那么它可能不会带来任何总体益处。本综述旨在确定肝切除是否为安全的手术,以及就实现根治性切除和长期生存而言,相较于单纯局部胆管切除,肝切除是否具有任何有益效果。对1989年6月至1997年12月在首尔峨山医疗中心接受手术治疗的151例肝门部胆管癌患者的记录进行了回顾性分析。128例患者可行手术切除。其余23例患者接受了手术姑息性引流。17例患者仅行局部胆管切除。111例患者因肿瘤侵犯二级胆管或肝实质而进行了肝切除;这111例患者中有29例(26.1%)需要进行门静脉切除,18例(16.2%)联合了胰十二指肠切除术。7例患者在肝切除术后住院期间死亡,手术死亡率为6.3%。17例局部胆管切除中有4例胆管切除切缘在组织学检查时无肿瘤,但111例肝切除中有86例切缘无肿瘤。局部胆管切除术后1年、2年、3年和4年的累积生存率分别为85.7%、42.9%、21.4%和0%。然而,肝切除术后(不包括手术死亡率)1年、2年、3年和5年的生存率分别为97.1%、72.8%、55.3%和24.0%。肝切除术后的生存率及切缘无肿瘤患者的比例均优于局部胆管切除术后。只有当手术积极且包括肝切除时,肝门部胆管癌切除才能带来长期生存。