Keirse M J
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Sep;92(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00454-1.
International variations in intrauterine growth have consistently been judged in terms of average birthweight, low birthweight or birthweight-for-gestational age criteria. Neither of these provide an appropriate assessment of fetal growth. Notwithstanding these limitations the available evidence indicates that variations in growth, both within and among populations, relate predominantly to differences in the prevalence of factors that restrain growth rather than to inherent differences in growth potential. The evidence also indicates that differences in the frequency of low weight-for-gestation among populations do not only reflect factors that restrict fetal growth. They are also intimately linked to variations in gestational age and to frequencies of preterm birth in particular. Hence, if weight-for-gestational standards are to become more informative and more universally applied than they have been so far, it may be useful to acknowledge their limitations more explicitly and simplify their implementation in a wider range of communities.
一直以来,宫内生长的国际差异都是依据平均出生体重、低出生体重或出生体重与孕周的关系标准来评判的。但这些都无法对胎儿生长进行恰当评估。尽管存在这些局限性,现有证据表明,人群内部和人群之间的生长差异主要与抑制生长因素的流行率差异有关,而非生长潜力的固有差异。证据还表明,人群中低孕周体重的频率差异不仅反映了限制胎儿生长的因素。它们还与孕周变化,尤其是早产频率密切相关。因此,如果孕周体重标准要比目前更具信息性且得到更广泛应用,更明确地认识其局限性并在更广泛的社区简化其实施方式可能会有所帮助。