Antitachycardia burst pacing for pleomorphic reentrant ventricular tachycardias associated with non-coronary artery diseases: a morphology specific programming for ventricular tachycardias.

To study the role of antitachycardia burst pacing in patients with reentrant pleomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with non-coronary artery diseases, the efficacy of antitachycardia pacing and appropriate antitachycardia pacing cycle length were evaluated in each pleomorphic VT morphology of seven patients. Seven patients were included in this study. Clinically documented pleomorphic VTs were reproduced in an electrophysiologic study. For each VT, rapid ventricular pacing was attempted from the apex of the right ventricle at a cycle length which was 20 ms shorter than that of VT and repeated after a decrement of the cycle length in steps of 10 ms until the VT was terminated or accelerated. All 16 VTs could be entrained by the rapid pacing, and 13 of the 16 VTs (81%) were terminated, whereas pacing-induced acceleration was observed in the other 3 VTs of the 3 patients. VT cycle length (VTCL), block cycle length (BCL) which was defined as the longest VT interrupting paced cycle length, %BCL/VTCL and entrainment zone which was defined as VTCL minus BCL, varied in each VT morphology of each patient. In two patients, antitachycardia pacing was effective in all VT morphologies and the maximum difference of the %BCL/VTCL among the pleomorphic VTs was less than 10%. Thus, antitachycardia pacing seemed to be beneficial for these patients. In the other 5 patients, a difference of more than 10% in %BCL/VTCL was observed among the pleomorphic VT morphologies and/or at least one VT morphology showed pacing-induced acceleration. Compared to the 13 terminated VTs, three accelerated VTs had a wide entrainment zone [160 +/- 44 vs 90 +/- 48 ms, p < 0.04] and small %BCL/VTCL [61 +/- 6 vs 77 +/- 11%,p<0.03]. In pleomorphic VTs associated with non-coronary artery diseases, responses to rapid pacing was not uniform; VT might be terminable or accelerated even in the same patient. We need to pay close attention when programming antitachycardia pacing in patients with pleomorphic VT.