Sériès F, Straus C, Demoule A, Attali V, Arnulf I, Derenne J P, Similowski T
Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):795-800. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9906135.
Phrenic nerve stimulation can reproduce during wakefulness the dissociation between upper airway and inspiratory muscles that is associated with obstructive sleep-related breathing disorders. This could provide a useful management tool in the study of passive upper airway (UA) dynamics during wakefulness in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). To assess the feasibility of the technique in this setting, we studied the dynamics of diaphragm twitch-associated inspiratory flow in eight patients with OSAHS. Cervical magnetic stimulation (CMS) and bilateral anterior magnetic phrenic stimulation (BAMPS) were applied at end-expiration during exclusive nasal breathing. Electrical phrenic nerve stimulation (ES) proved not feasible. The driving pressure and the respiratory resistance at peak twitch esophageal pressure obtained at maximal stimulation intensity were significantly higher with BAMPS than with CMS. A twitch-flow limitation pattern was observed in seven of eight subjects; VI(max) values of flow-limited twitches obtained at 100% stimulation intensity was 0.81 +/- 0.5 L/s with BAMPS and 0.87 +/- 0.5 L/s with CMS (p = 0.4). The number of flow-limited BAMPS twitches dropped from an average 77.5% to 18.4% with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) levels corresponding to the patient's home treatment. We conclude that (1) BAMPS is potentially a useful tool to evaluate the dynamics of flow through the passive UA in awake OSAHS patients, (2) BAMPS may be superior to CMS in evaluating UA properties in OSAHS.
膈神经刺激可在清醒状态下重现与阻塞性睡眠相关呼吸障碍相关的上气道与吸气肌之间的分离。这可为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者清醒状态下被动上气道(UA)动力学研究提供一种有用的管理工具。为评估该技术在此情况下的可行性,我们研究了8例OSAHS患者膈肌抽搐相关吸气气流的动力学。在呼气末进行单纯鼻呼吸时,应用颈部磁刺激(CMS)和双侧前磁膈神经刺激(BAMPS)。电膈神经刺激(ES)被证明不可行。在最大刺激强度下,BAMPS获得的峰值抽搐食管压力时的驱动压力和呼吸阻力显著高于CMS。8名受试者中有7名观察到抽搐气流受限模式;在100%刺激强度下,BAMPS获得的气流受限抽搐的VI(max)值为0.81±0.5L/s,CMS为0.87±0.5L/s(p = 0.4)。随着对应患者家庭治疗的鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)水平,BAMPS气流受限抽搐的数量从平均77.5%降至18.4%。我们得出结论:(1)BAMPS可能是评估清醒OSAHS患者通过被动UA的气流动力学的有用工具,(2)在评估OSAHS患者的UA特性方面,BAMPS可能优于CMS。